ArticleIEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology2024
Masked Modeling-Based Ultrasound Image Classification via Self-Supervised Learning.
Article in IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning in ultrasound tongue imaging: a systematic review toward automated detection of speech sound disorders.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- From pixels to precision: a narrative review of AI-driven 3D morphological analysis and digital twinning in alveolar cleft management.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, deep learning-based methods have emerged as the preferred approach for ultrasound data analysis. However, these methods often require large-scale annotated datasets for training deep models, which are not readily available in practical scenarios. Additionally, the presence of speckle noise and other imaging artifacts can introduce numerous hard examples for ultrasound data classification. In this paper, drawing inspiration from self-supervised learning techniques, we present a pre-training method based on mask modeling specifically designed for ultrasound data. Our study investigates three different mask modeling strategies: random masking, vertical masking, and horizontal masking. By employing these strategies, our pre-training approach aims to predict the masked portion of the ultrasound images. Notably, our method does not rely on externally labeled data, allowing us to extract representative features without the need for human annotation. Consequently, we can leverage unlabeled datasets for pre-training. Furthermore, to address the challenges posed by hard samples in ultrasound data, we propose a novel hard sample mining strategy. To evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed method, we conduct experiments on two datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that our approach outperforms other state-of-the-art methods in ultrasound image classification. This indicates the superiority of our pre-training method and its ability to extract discriminative features from ultrasound data, even in the presence of hard examples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.