Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38606392›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2024

Improving Dysarthric Speech Segmentation With Emulated and Synthetic Augmentation.

Saeid Alavi Naeini, Leif Simmatis, Deniz Jafari, Yana Yunusova, Babak Taati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saeid Alavi NaeiniKITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network (UHN) Toronto ON M5G 2A2 Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3479-5433
Leif SimmatisKITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network (UHN) Toronto ON M5G 2A2 Canada.
Deniz JafariKITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network (UHN) Toronto ON M5G 2A2 Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1050-159X
Yana YunusovaKITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network (UHN) Toronto ON M5G 2A2 Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2353-2275
Babak TaatiKITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network (UHN) Toronto ON M5G 2A2 Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9763-4293
University Health Network · CA

Funding

The development and validation of a novel tool for the assessment of bulbar dysfunction in ALSR01DC017291 · NIDCD · SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI JORDAN R GREEN, Yana Yunusova · 2018 to 2026
$3.6M
SPEECH MOVEMENT CLASSIFICATION FOR ASSESSING AND TREATING ALSR01DC013547 · NIDCD · MGH INSTITUTE OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS · PI GREEN, JORDAN R · 2014 to 2018
$3.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013547NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acoustic features extracted from speech can help with the diagnosis of neurological diseases and monitoring of symptoms over time. Temporal segmentation of audio signals into individual words is an important pre-processing step needed prior to extracting acoustic features. Machine learning techniques could be used to automate speech segmentation via automatic speech recognition (ASR) and sequence to sequence alignment. While state-of-the-art ASR models achieve good performance on healthy speech, their performance significantly drops when evaluated on dysarthric speech. Fine-tuning ASR models on impaired speech can improve performance in dysarthric individuals, but it requires representative clinical data, which is difficult to collect and may raise privacy concerns. This study explores the feasibility of using two augmentation methods to increase ASR performance on dysarthric speech: 1) healthy individuals varying their speaking rate and loudness (as is often used in assessments of pathological speech); 2) synthetic speech with variations in speaking rate and accent (to ensure more diverse vocal representations and fairness). Experimental evaluations showed that fine-tuning a pre-trained ASR model with data from these two sources outperformed a model fine-tuned only on real clinical data and matched the performance of a model fine-tuned on the combination of real clinical data and synthetic speech. When evaluated on held-out acoustic data from 24 individuals with various neurological diseases, the best performing model achieved an average word error rate of 5.7% and a mean correct count accuracy of 94.4%. In segmenting the data into individual words, a mean intersection-over-union of 89.2% was obtained against manual parsing (ground truth). It can be concluded that emulated and synthetic augmentations can significantly reduce the need for real clinical data of dysarthric speech when fine-tuning ASR models and, in turn, for speech segmentation.

Indexed as

SpeechSpeech PerceptionDysarthriaHumansSpeech DisordersSpeech Recognition Softwaredata augmentationDysarthriaorofacial assessmentspeech recognitionspeech segmentation

Identifiers

PMID38606392
PMCPMC11008804
OpenAlexW4392638861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.