Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38606366›Full record

ArticleIEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision2024

Ordinal Classification with Distance Regularization for Robust Brain Age Prediction.

Jay Shah, Md Mahfuzur Rahman Siddiquee, Yi Su, Teresa Wu, Baoxin Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Association of imaging-defined brain age with disease severity and adverse outcomes in CADASIL.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jay ShahArizona State University.
Md Mahfuzur Rahman SiddiqueeArizona State University.
Yi SuASU-Mayo Center for Innovative Imaging.
Teresa WuArizona State University.
Baoxin LiArizona State University.
Arizona State University · US

Funding

Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN MORRIS · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
The natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 2005 to 2025
$49.5M
APOE in the Predisposition to, Protection from and Prevention of Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG069453 · NIA · BANNER HEALTH · PI ASHTON, NICHOLAS, LANGBAUM, JESSICA BROOKE · 2020 to 2025
$27.4M
Research Education ComponentP30AG072980 · NIA · BANNER HEALTH · PI Nicholas Ashton · 2021 to 2026
$24.9M
Tracer harmonization for amyloid and tau PET imaging using statistical and deep learning techniquesRF1AG073424 · NIA · BANNER HEALTH · PI SU, YI · 2022 to 2022
$2.3M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072980NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069453NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG073424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age is one of the major known risk factors for Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Detecting AD early is crucial for effective treatment and preventing irreversible brain damage. Brain age, a measure derived from brain imaging reflecting structural changes due to aging, may have the potential to identify AD onset, assess disease risk, and plan targeted interventions. Deep learning-based regression techniques to predict brain age from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans have shown great accuracy recently. However, these methods are subject to an inherent regression to the mean effect, which causes a systematic bias resulting in an overestimation of brain age in young subjects and underestimation in old subjects. This weakens the reliability of predicted brain age as a valid biomarker for downstream clinical applications. Here, we reformulate the brain age prediction task from regression to classification to address the issue of systematic bias. Recognizing the importance of preserving ordinal information from ages to understand aging trajectory and monitor aging longitudinally, we propose a novel ORdinal Distance Encoded Regularization (ORDER) loss that incorporates the order of age labels, enhancing the model's ability to capture age-related patterns. Extensive experiments and ablation studies demonstrate that this framework reduces systematic bias, outperforms state-of-art methods by statistically significant margins, and can better capture subtle differences between clinical groups in an independent AD dataset. Our implementation is publicly available at https://github.com/jaygshah/Robust-Brain-Age-Prediction.

Identifiers

PMID38606366
PMCPMC11008505
OpenAlexW4392971823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.