Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38606348›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2023

Recruitment and retention of clinical trial participants: understanding motivations of patients with chronic pain and other populations.

Joyce K Anastasi, Bernadette Capili, Margaret Norton, Donald J McMahon, Karen Marder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joyce K AnastasiDivision of Special Studies in Symptom Management, New York University, New York, NY, United States.
Bernadette CapiliHeilbrunn Family Center for Research Nursing, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, United States.
Margaret NortonDivision of Special Studies in Symptom Management, New York University, New York, NY, United States.
Donald J McMahonDivision of Special Studies in Symptom Management, New York University, New York, NY, United States.
Karen MarderIrving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

A Symptom Management Efficacy Study to Reduce Distal Neuropathic PainR01NR017917 · NINR · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ANASTASI, JOYCE K · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR017917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper aims to present and discuss the issues, challenges, and strategies related to recruitment and retention in clinical trials involving participants with chronic pain. The randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) is widely regarded as the gold standard for evaluating clinical interventions. However, it is crucial to acknowledge and address the challenges associated with recruiting and retaining participants. To prioritize the experience of the study population, targeted outreach strategies and a patient-centric approach are necessary. Researchers should consider incorporating recruitment and retention strategies during the study design phase. Implementing multi-pronged recruitment methods, leveraging relationships with community providers, and involving representatives of the patient population are helpful approaches. Effective communication and maintaining a professional environment are vital for optimizing engagement and supporting the successful execution of clinical trials involving participants with chronic pain.

Indexed as

chronic conditionschronic painclinical trialsrecruitmentretentionstudy participants

Identifiers

PMID38606348
PMCPMC11006977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.