Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38606292›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2024

Clinical performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for diagnosis of pulmonary

Ziwei Jiang, Wei Gai, Xiaojing Zhang, Yafeng Zheng, Xuru Jin, Zhiqiang Han, Geriletu Ao, Jiahuan He, Danni Shu, Xianbing Liu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Beyond detection: quantitative interpretation ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinical Characteristics of 40 Cases ofInfection and drug resistance · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Recent developments inMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ziwei Jiang *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.
Wei Gai *WillingMed Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Xiaojing Zhang *WillingMed Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Yafeng ZhengWillingMed Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Xuru JinDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.
Zhiqiang HanDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.
Geriletu AoDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.
Jiahuan HeDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.
Danni ShuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.
Xianbing LiuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.
Yingying ZhouDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.
Zhidan HuaDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Investigations assessing the value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for distinguish Methods: The performance of mNGS in distinguishing Results: The abundance of Conclusion: BALF mNGS is a valuable tool for differentiating between colonization and infection of

Indexed as

AspergillosisEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsPneumoniaAnti-Bacterial AgentsAspergillusBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCoughHemoglobinsHerpesvirus 4, HumanHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLungRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAnti-Bacterial AgentsHemoglobinsAspergilluscolonizationmetagenomic next-generation sequencingoptimal threshold valuepulmonary aspergillosis

Identifiers

PMID38606292
PMCPMC11007027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.