Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38606262›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Self-Shielding Gyroscopic Radiosurgery: A Prospective Experience and Analysis of the First 100 Patients.

Felix Ehret, Nadja Kohlhase, Dochka Eftimova, Theresa Hofmann, Christoph Fürweger, Alfred Haidenberger, Markus Kufeld, Alexander Muacevic, Antonio Santacroce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Felix EhretRadiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, DEU.
Nadja KohlhaseRadiation Oncology, European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Munich, DEU.
Dochka EftimovaRadiation Oncology, European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Munich, DEU.
Theresa HofmannRadiation Oncology, European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Munich, DEU.
Christoph FürwegerMedical Physics, European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Munich, DEU.
Alfred HaidenbergerRadiation Oncology, European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Munich, DEU.
Markus KufeldRadiosurgery, European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Munich, DEU.
Alexander MuacevicRadiosurgery, European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Munich, DEU.
Antonio SantacroceRadiosurgery, European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Munich, DEU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Stereotactic radiosurgery is a well-established treatment option for the management of various benign and malignant brain tumors. It can be delivered with several treatment platforms, usually requiring shielded radiation vaults to meet regulatory safety requirements. Recent technical advances have led to the first self-shielding platform enabling the delivery of gyroscopic radiosurgery (GRS). Given the limited number of GRS treatment platforms, the novelty of its characteristics, and the lack of available data, we report our prospective experience with the first 100 patients treated with GRS. Materials and methods Patients undergoing GRS for the treatment of intracranial tumors were enrolled in this prospective study. Patient and treatment characteristics, including patient satisfaction, were collected and analyzed. Results A total of 100 patients with 155 tumors were treated. The most commonly treated tumors comprised brain metastases (BM) (49%), vestibular schwannomas (31%), and meningiomas (14%). The median prescription dose for malignant and benign tumors was 20 and 13 Gy, respectively. The median prescription isodose line was 56%. Gross tumor volumes were small, with a median of 0.37 cc for BM and 0.92 cc for the other entities. The median total treatment time was 40 minutes. Dosimetric performance indices showed median values of 1.20 (conformity index), 1.24 (new conformity index), 1.74 (homogeneity index), and 3.13 (gradient index). Volumetric assessment of the treated tumors showed an overall decrease in size at the first available follow-up. Most patients were satisfied with the treatment experience. Conclusion Our first prospective experience of the use of GRS is favorable. Analyses of the dosimetric performance, treatment times, volumetric assessment, and patient satisfaction demonstrate its suitability for stereotactic treatments of intracranial tumors. Further prospective clinical and dosimetric analyses for GRS are pending.

Indexed as

brain metastasismeningiomaneurosurgeryradiation oncologyradiosurgerystereotactic radiosurgeryvestibular schwannoma

Identifiers

PMID38606262
PMCPMC11008698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.