ArticleCureus2024
Nasal Pyriform Aperture Stenosis in a Newborn: When to Operate.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis (CNPAS) is a very rare cause of neonatal respiratory distress and is often missed because of its rarity. It arises from the overgrowth of the nasal process of the maxilla. Maxillofacial CT scan findings of pyriform aperture width <11 mm in a full-term baby, median central incisor, triangular-shaped palate, and median palatal ridge confirm the diagnosis. We describe here a case of CNPAS admitted with respiratory distress that increased further on feeding. An infant feeding tube of size 6 was not negotiable through the nostrils. Resistance was appreciated at the inlet of the nostril. Maxillofacial CT showed pyriform aperture stenosis of 3.4 mm, suggesting CNPAS. The child could not be weaned off a high-flow nasal cannula despite conservative management with decongestants, steroids spray, dilatation, and stenting for 20 days. Subsequently, surgical widening of the nasal aperture by a sublabial approach was done. The child was discharged on the 10th postoperative day on full oral feeds. It is important to suspect CNPAS in neonates with respiratory distress where other common causes have been ruled out, as it can be treated by surgery in cases refractory to conservative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.