ArticleCureus2024
Ibuprofen Compared to Acetazolamide for the Prevention of Acute Mountain Sickness: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Altitude illnesses.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcetazolamide is recommended for the prevention of acute mountain sickness (AMS); however, its use is limited in some areas because of side effects. Previous studies report ibuprofen to be similar to or slightly inferior to acetazolamide. This randomized, triple-blinded, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial was designed to compare ibuprofen with acetazolamide for the prevention of AMS.
methodsFour hundred forty-three healthy Asian Indian men with a mean age of 29 (range: 20-49) years were randomized into three groups A, B, and P at 350m (SL). Acetazolamide (A): 85 mg; ibuprofen (B): 600 mg; or placebo (P): calcium carbonate was administered thrice daily, starting one day prior and continuing for three days after arrival at 3500m (HA). Participants were evaluated for AMS using the Lake Louise Questionnaire and for pulse, BP, SpO
resultsOf the 443 participants recruited at SL, 139 could not be airlifted due to logistical limitations, and 304 were available for follow-up at HA. Among these, 254 had ascended as per protocol. By intent to treat (IT) (N = 304; A = 99, B = 102, P = 103), the incidence of AMS (LLQS>/=3) was 12%, 5%, and 13%, and the incidence of severe AMS was 1%, 2%, and 6%, in groups A, B, and P, respectively. Using per protocol analysis (PP) (N = 254; A = 83, B = 87, P = 84), the incidence of AMS was 12%, 6%, and 13% in groups A, B, and P, respectively. The relative risk for developing AMS vs. placebo was A-0.96 (CI:0.46-2.0, p=0.91), B-0.39 (CI:0.14-1.04, p=0.06), A-0.94 (CI:0.42-2.1, p=0.88), and B-0.45 (0.16-1.24, p=0.12) by IT and PP, respectively.
conclusionIbuprofen is effective in males for the prevention of AMS with rapid ascent to 3500 m-rest for the first two days. Acetazolamide was superior to ibuprofen in the prevention of moderate-to-severe AMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.