ArticleJBMR plus2024
Mouse mandibular-derived osteoclast progenitors have differences in intrinsic properties compared with femoral-derived progenitors.
Article in JBMR plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell signaling and transcriptional regulation of osteoclast lineage commitment, differentiation, bone resorption and diseases.Cell discovery · 2026Review
- Alcohol consumption exacerbates high-fat diet-mediated disruptions in myelopoiesis and osteoclastogenesis in mouse models of metabolic dysfunction-associated liver diseases.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Unraveling Jawbone Susceptibility: Distinctive Features Underlying Medication-Related Osteonecrosis.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Article
- Skeletal site-specific variations in myeloid cells: insights from single-cell RNA sequencing of the mandible and femur.JBMR plus · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Craniofacial osteoclasts are essential for site-specific processes such as alveolar bone resorption, tooth eruption, and orthodontic tooth movement. Much of the current understanding of osteoclast development and function comes from studies using long bone-derived cells. Minimal investigation has been done to explore skeletal site differences. The overall goal of this study was to determine if mandibular- and femoral-derived osteoclasts represent distinct populations. To test this hypothesis, bone marrow cells were initially analyzed from the mandible and femur of 2-month-old mice. It was shown that mandibular-derived osteoclasts have enhanced size (mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.