Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38606113›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2024

Adverse events following Measles-Mumps-Rubella and varicella immunization: A safety profile analysis and comparison of different vaccination schedules based on the Italian Pharmacovigilance Network in the Veneto Region.

Nicola Soriolo, Roberto Benoni, Diana Dalla Valle, Francesco Zunino, Adele Olivieri, Irene Campagna, Stefano Tardivo, Laura Augusta Gonella, Francesca Russo, Michele Tonon and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola SorioloUniversity of Verona, Diagnostics and Public Health Department, Section of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Verona, Italy.
Roberto BenoniUniversity of Verona, Diagnostics and Public Health Department, Section of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Verona, Italy.
Diana Dalla ValleUniversity of Verona, Diagnostics and Public Health Department, Section of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Verona, Italy.
Francesco ZuninoUniversity of Verona, Diagnostics and Public Health Department, Section of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Verona, Italy.
Adele OlivieriUniversity of Verona, Diagnostics and Public Health Department, Section of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Verona, Italy.
Irene CampagnaUniversity of Verona, Diagnostics and Public Health Department, Section of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Verona, Italy.
Stefano TardivoUniversity of Verona, Diagnostics and Public Health Department, Section of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Verona, Italy.
Laura Augusta GonellaUniversity of Verona, Diagnostics and Public Health Department, Section of Pharmacology, Verona, Italy.
Francesca RussoDirectorate for Prevention, Food Safety, Veterinary - Public Health Veneto Region, Italy.
Michele TononDirectorate for Prevention, Food Safety, Veterinary - Public Health Veneto Region, Italy.
Filippo Da ReDirectorate for Prevention, Food Safety, Veterinary - Public Health Veneto Region, Italy.
Ugo MorettiUniversity of Verona, Diagnostics and Public Health Department, Section of Pharmacology, Verona, Italy.
Giovanna ZanoniUniversity Hospital of Verona, Pathology and Diagnostics Department, Immunology Unit, Verona, Italy.
Francesca MorettiUniversity of Verona, Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences Department, Verona, Italy.
University of Verona · ITRegione del Veneto · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella and varicella (MMR and V) have been mandatory in Italy since 2017. Two different vaccination strategies are suggested for the first dose: trivalent MMR and a separate V vaccine or the tetravalent MMRV vaccine. Our aim is to compare the safety profile of MMRV and MMR-V vaccines through the passive adverse event reporting system in the Veneto region and to perform a case-by-case review of a few conditions of interest (febrile and afebrile seizures, ataxia, encephalitis, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and Henoch-Schönlein Purpura). Age and sex differences were also explored. Methods: We identified all reports following MMRV or MMR-V vaccination in the Veneto Region and received into the National Pharmacovigilance Network between 2007 and April 30, 2022. Results: 9,510 reports were retrieved, of which 5,662 (59.5 %) were related to MMRV and 3,848 (40.5 %) to MMR-V. No safety signals were detected supporting the evidence that MMRV and MMR-V vaccinations have a good safety profile. The reporting rate (RR) for serious events between 2007 and 2022 resulted in 13.67 per 10,000 administered doses for MMRV and 10.90 for MMR-V. Conclusion: Passive surveillance data show a significantly higher rate of serious events for males 0-2 years old, both overall and stratified per vaccination strategy. Further studies are needed to confirm this observation. The analyses suggest that retrieved differences do not have a significant impact on the overall safety of both formulations.

Indexed as

Adverse EffectsImmunizationMeaslesMumpsRubellaSafetySurveillanceVaricella

Identifiers

PMID38606113
PMCPMC11007536
OpenAlexW4393321433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.