ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Cuproptosis in glioblastoma: unveiling a novel prognostic model and therapeutic potential.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Photodynamic Therapy for Glioblastoma: Potential Application of TiOPharmaceutics · 2025Review
- An immune-related gene pair signature predicts the prognosis and immunotherapeutic response in glioblastoma.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma, a notably aggressive brain tumor, is characterized by a brief survival period and resistance to conventional therapeutic approaches. With the recent identification of "Cuproptosis," a copper-dependent apoptosis mechanism, this study aimed to explore its role in glioblastoma prognosis and potential therapeutic implications. A comprehensive methodology was employed, starting with the identification and analysis of 65 cuproptosis-related genes. These genes were subjected to differential expression analyses between glioblastoma tissues and normal counterparts. A novel metric, the "CP-score," was devised to quantify the cuproptosis response in glioblastoma patients. Building on this, a prognostic model, the CP-model, was developed using Cox regression techniques, designed to operate on both bulk and single-cell data. The differential expression analysis revealed 31 genes with distinct expression patterns in glioblastoma. The CP-score was markedly elevated in glioblastoma patients, suggesting an intensified cuproptosis response. The CP-model adeptly stratified patients into distinct risk categories, unveiling intricate associations between glioblastoma prognosis, immune response pathways, and the tumor's immunological environment. Further analyses indicated that high-risk patients, as per the CP-model, exhibited heightened expression of certain immune checkpoints, suggesting potential therapeutic targets. Additionally, the model hinted at the possibility of personalized therapeutic strategies, with certain drugs showing increased efficacy in high-risk patients. The CP-model offers a promising tool for glioblastoma prognosis and therapeutic strategy development, emphasizing the potential of Cuproptosis in cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.