ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
Improving the maize crop row navigation line recognition method of YOLOX.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Improved DeepLabV3+-Based Method for Crop Row Segmentation and Navigation Line Extraction in Agricultural Fields.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Maize Detection and Row Extraction Using Maize-YOLO and IPM-Clustering Method for Autonomous Agricultural Navigation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Research on Orchard Navigation Line Recognition Method Based on U-Net.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Computer vision-based steering path visualization of headlands in soybean fields.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate identification of maize crop row navigation lines is crucial for the navigation of intelligent weeding machinery, yet it faces significant challenges due to lighting variations and complex environments. This study proposes an optimized version of the YOLOX-Tiny single-stage detection network model for accurately identifying maize crop row navigation lines. It incorporates adaptive illumination adjustment and multi-scale prediction to enhance dense target detection. Visual attention mechanisms, including Efficient Channel Attention and Cooperative Attention modules, are introduced to better extract maize features. A Fast Spatial Pyramid Pooling module is incorporated to improve target localization accuracy. The Coordinate Intersection over Union loss function is used to further enhance detection accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that the improved YOLOX-Tiny model achieves an average precision of 92.2 %, with a detection time of 15.6 milliseconds. This represents a 16.4 % improvement over the original model while maintaining high accuracy. The proposed model has a reduced size of 18.6 MB, representing a 7.1 % reduction. It also incorporates the least squares method for accurately fitting crop rows. The model showcases efficiency in processing large amounts of data, achieving a comprehensive fitting time of 42 milliseconds and an average angular error of 0.59°. The improved YOLOX-Tiny model offers substantial support for the navigation of intelligent weeding machinery in practical applications, contributing to increased agricultural productivity and reduced usage of chemical herbicides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.