ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2024
Evaluation of data uncertainty for deep-learning-based CT noise reduction using ensemble patient data and a virtual imaging trial framework.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning in CT image reconstruction and processing: techniques, performance evaluation, radiation dose, and future perspective.The British journal of radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning-based image reconstruction and noise reduction (DLIR) methods have been increasingly deployed in clinical CT. Accurate assessment of their data uncertainty properties is essential to understand the stability of DLIR in response to noise. In this work, we aim to evaluate the data uncertainty of a DLIR method using real patient data and a virtual imaging trial framework and compare it with filtered-backprojection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR). The ensemble of noise realizations was generated by using a realistic projection domain noise insertion technique. The impact of varying dose levels and denoising strengths were investigated for a ResNet-based deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model trained using patient images. On the uncertainty maps, DCNN shows more detailed structures than IR although its bias map has less structural dependency, which implies that DCNN is more sensitive to small changes in the input. Both visual examples and histogram analysis demonstrated that hotspots of uncertainty in DCNN may be associated with a higher chance of distortion from the truth than IR, but it may also correspond to a better detection performance for some of the small structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.