ReviewJournal of family medicine and primary care2024
Collage of cases and brief review of the laboratory diagnosis and molecular testing in autoimmune haemolytic anaemia.
Review in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) is an acquired heterogenous clinical entity with variable presentations like acute haemolysis or mild, chronic haemolysis compounded with acute exacerbation in winters or fatal uncompensated haemolysis. A step-wise approach to the diagnosis and characterisation of AIHA should be undertaken, firstly the diagnosis of haemolysis followed by the establishment of immune nature with the aid of direct agglutination tests (DAT). Simultaneously the other causes of immune haemolysis need to be excluded too. In light of advancements in diagnostics, a wide array of investigations can be used like absolute reticulocyte count, bone marrow responsiveness index to establish the evidence of haemolysis, sensitive gel technology, enhanced DAT assays, e.g., modified DAT with low ionic strength saline solution (LISS) at 4°C, DAT assays utilizing reagents such as anti-IgA and anti-IgM and DAT by flowcytometry, to detect RBC bound autoantibodies (Abs) and monospecific DAT to establish immune causes of haemolysis and characterisation of the autoantibodies. The compensatory role of bone marrow and synchronous pathologies like clonal lymphoproliferation, dyserythropoiesis, fibrosis are important factors in the evolution of the disease and aid in the customisation of treatment modalities. The laboratory work up should aim to diagnose underlying diseases like chronic lymphoproliferative disorders, autoimmune disorders and infectious diseases. Also, tests like autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndromes (ALPS) screening panel and Next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel for RBC membrane disorders, RBC enzymopathies, and congenital dyserythropoietic aneamia have found their place. It is incumbent upon the clinicians to use the all-available diagnostic modalities for the accurate diagnosis, prognostication and customisation of the therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.