Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38605779›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024

Comparison of the efficacy of propranolol versus amitriptyline as monotherapy for prophylaxis of migraine.

Krinaben M Patel, Kachhadia M Popatbhai, Roshni Xavier, Mohammed A S Aramin, Khalid J F Faris, Mohammed A Mateen, Priyadarshi Prajwal, Mohammed D M Marsool, Hafsa Sheikh, Esra H A G Mohamed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Krinaben M PatelM.B.B.S., GMERS College, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Kachhadia M PopatbhaiM.B.B.S., P.D.U College, Civil Hospital Campus, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Roshni XavierMedical Officer at Carewell Hospital, Padapparamba, Malappuram, Kerala, India.
Mohammed A S AraminFaculty of Medicine, Al Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Khalid J F FarisFaculty of Medicine, Al Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Mohammed A MateenFaculty of Medicine, Al Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Priyadarshi PrajwalDepartment of Neurology, Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Mohammed D M MarsoolM.B.B.S., Neurology, Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical College, Pune, India.
Hafsa SheikhMedical Student, University of Baghdad, Al-Kindy College of Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq.
Esra H A G MohamedDepartment of Human Clinical Anatomy, National Ribat University, Sudan.
Al-Quds University · PSBharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University · INNational Ribat University · SDUniversity of Baghdad · IQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Approximately 15% of migraine sufferers need preventative medicine because they have more than two episodes each month. Migraine is a regular, persistent condition that frequently makes victims helpless. Numerous drugs from various classes have so far been used in migraine prophylaxis. Their effectiveness is recurrently overshadowed by their side effects because they must be used for a long time, which occasionally necessitates stopping the drug. Materials and Methods: In the tertiary care teaching hospital's department of medicine, a prospective, comparative, open-label study was initiated. Two groups of 80 patients were randomly chosen. For 3 months, the 40 patients in Group A were given a tablet of amitriptyline 10 mg once daily, whereas the 40 patients in Group B were given a tablet of propranolol 20 mg once a day. At the conclusion of the fourth, eighth, and twelfth weeks, the patients' own self-assessment migraine diary and a 4-point pain scale were used to grade the intensity of the headaches. Results: As a result, in Group A, the mean migraine attack severity in periods 1 and 2 was 5.88 2.69 and 5.41 2.48, respectively. In Group B, the mean was 5.15 2.75 in period 1 and 5.66 2.78 in period 2, respectively. The average length of a migraine attack in Group A was 20.30 5.61 h in period 1 and 16.75 5.23 h in period 2. In Group B, the mean was 16.59 3.21 in period 1 and 18.78 5.14 in period 2. Between groups A and B, there was a statistically significant difference. Conclusion: The average number of migraine attacks reduced in the amitriptyline and propranolol groups as the treatment duration increased. Amitriptyline is a popular medication with established effectiveness and manageable levels of negative side effects. It is the tricyclic antidepressant that is most frequently used to prevent headaches. When administered for migraine prevention, it generates a quick response within 3 months. Propranolol is less effective than amitriptyline at reducing the frequency, length, and severity of episodes.

Indexed as

Amitriptylineheadache preventionmigrainetricyclic antidepressants

Identifiers

PMID38605779
PMCPMC11006045
OpenAlexW4392454787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.