ArticleHealth science reports2024
Placenta accreta outcomes and risk factors in a referral hospital in north of Iran: A case control study.
Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder After Prior Non-Cesarean Delivery Uterine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2025Pooled it
- Anaesthesia management and perioperative clinical outcomes in caesarean section patients with placental pathology: a retrospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Placenta accreta outcomes and risk factors in a referral hospital in north of Iran: A case control study.Health science reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Placenta accreta syndrome (PAS) may led to heavy blood loss and maternal death. Here we analyzed the main risk factors of PAS Methods: In a case control study, all pregnant women with PAS referred to our department during 2016 till 2021 were enrolled and divided in two groups case (PAS+) and control (PAS-) based on preoperative imaging, intraoperative findings, and pathological reports. The sociodemographic features and neonatal-maternal outcomes also were recorded. Results: The most frequent reason for cesarean (C/S) was repeated C/S (62.9%, 56/89). A significant difference showed up in the time lag between previous C/S and the present delivery ( Conclusions: It seems that, in addition to repeated C/S as a strong risk factor, previous abortion is a forgotten key which leads to incomplete evacuation or damage the endometrial-myometrial layers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.