Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38605654›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2024

Application of natural language processing to predict final recommendation of Brazilian health technology assessment reports.

Marilia Mastrocolla de Almeida Cardoso, Juliana Machado-Rugolo, Lehana Thabane, Naila Camila da Rocha, Abner Mácula Pacheco Barbosa, Denis Satoshi Komoda, Juliana Tereza Coneglian de Almeida, Daniel da Silva Pereira Curado, Silke Anna Theresa Weber, Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marilia Mastrocolla de Almeida CardosoHealth Technology Assessment Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Botucatu, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6231-5425
Juliana Machado-RugoloHealth Technology Assessment Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Botucatu, Brazil.
Lehana ThabaneDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Naila Camila da RochaLaboratory of Data Science and Predictive Analysis in Health, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Botucatu, Brazil.
Abner Mácula Pacheco BarbosaLaboratory of Data Science and Predictive Analysis in Health, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Botucatu, Brazil.
Denis Satoshi KomodaDepartment of Collective Health, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Juliana Tereza Coneglian de AlmeidaHealth Technology Assessment Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Botucatu, Brazil.
Daniel da Silva Pereira CuradoDepartment of Management and Incorporation of Health Technologies, Ministry of Health, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Silke Anna Theresa WeberHealth Technology Assessment Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Botucatu, Brazil.
Luis Gustavo Modelli de AndradeLaboratory of Data Science and Predictive Analysis in Health, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Botucatu, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRMinistério da Saúde · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversity of Johannesburg · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth technology assessment (HTA) plays a vital role in healthcare decision-making globally, necessitating the identification of key factors impacting evaluation outcomes due to the significant workload faced by HTA agencies.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to predict the approval status of evaluations conducted by the Brazilian Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC) using natural language processing (NLP).

methodsData encompassing CONITEC's official report summaries from 2012 to 2022. Textual data was tokenized for NLP analysis. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator, logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, neural network, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were evaluated for accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) score, precision, and recall. Cluster analysis using the k-modes algorithm categorized entries into two clusters (approved, rejected).

resultsThe neural network model exhibited the highest accuracy metrics (precision at 0.815, accuracy at 0.769, ROC AUC at 0.871, and recall at 0.746), followed by XGBoost model. The lexical analysis uncovered linguistic markers, like references to international HTA agencies' experiences and government as demandant, potentially influencing CONITEC's decisions. Cluster and XGBoost analyses emphasized that approved evaluations mainly concerned drug assessments, often government-initiated, while non-approved ones frequently evaluated drugs, with the industry as the requester.

conclusionsNLP model can predict health technology incorporation outcomes, opening avenues for future research using HTA reports from other agencies. This model has the potential to enhance HTA system efficiency by offering initial insights and decision-making criteria, thereby benefiting healthcare experts.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalAlgorithmsBrazilBrazilhealth technology assessmentmachine learningnatural language processprediction analysis

Identifiers

PMID38605654
PMCPMC11569907
OpenAlexW4394755840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.