Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38605602›Full record

Observational studyESC heart failure2024

ECMO for drug-refractory electrical storm without a reversible trigger: a retrospective multicentric observational study.

Isabel Durães-Campos, Catarina Costa, Ana Rita Ferreira, Carla Basílio, Pau Torrella, Aida Neves, Ana Margarida Lebreiro, Gonçalo Pestana, Luís Adão, José Pinheiro-Torres and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in ESC heart failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A practical 5-stage clinical scale for electrical storm: the STORM classification.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The application of mechanical circulatory support in special conditions.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Isabel Durães-CamposDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Catarina CostaDepartment of Cardiology, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Ana Rita FerreiraDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Carla BasílioDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Pau TorrellaDepartment of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Aida NevesDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Ana Margarida LebreiroDepartment of Cardiology, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Gonçalo PestanaDepartment of Cardiology, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Luís AdãoDepartment of Cardiology, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
José Pinheiro-TorresDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Miguel Solla-BucetaIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario A Coruña, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), A Coruña, Spain.
Jordi RieraDepartment of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Juan Ignacio Chico-CarballasDepartment of Critical Care, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo (Pontevedra), Spain.
Sérgio GaiãoDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
José Artur PaivaDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Roberto Roncon-AlbuquerqueDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2966-2943
Hospital de São João · PTUniversidade do Porto · PTVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ESCentro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares · ESUniversity Hospital Complex Of Vigo · ES

Funding

FCT - Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology UIDB/00051/2020FCT - Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology UIDP/00051/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDrug-refractory electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening medical emergency. We describe the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in drug-refractory ES without a reversible trigger, for which specific guideline recommendations are still lacking. METHODS AND

resultsRetrospective observational study in four Iberian centres on the indications, treatment, complications, and outcome of drug-refractory ES not associated with acute coronary syndromes, decompensated heart failure, drug toxicity, electrolyte disturbances, endocrine emergencies, concomitant acute illness with fever, or poor compliance with anti-arrhythmic drugs, requiring VA-ECMO for circulatory support. Thirty-four (6%) out of 552 patients with VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock were included [71% men; 57 (44-62) years], 65% underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation before VA-ECMO implantation, and 26% during cannulation. Left ventricular unloading during VA-ECMO was used in 8 (24%) patients: 3 (9%) with intraaortic balloon pump, 3 (9%) with LV vent, and 2 (6%) with Impella. Thirty (88%) had structural heart disease and 8 (24%) had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. The drug-refractory ES was mostly due to monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) (59%), isolated monomorphic VT (26%), polymorphic VT (9%), or VF (6%). Thirty-one (91%) required deep sedation, 44% overdrive pacing, 36% catheter ablation, and 26% acute autonomic modulation. The main complications were nosocomial infection (47%), bleeding (24%), and limb ischaemia (21%). Eighteen (53%) were weaned from VA-ECMO, and 29% had heart transplantation. Twenty-seven (79%) survived to hospital discharge (48 (33-82) days). Non-survivors were older [62 (58-67) vs. 54 (43-58); P < 0.01] and had a higher first rhythm disorder-to-ECMO interval [0 (0-2) vs. 2 (1-11) days; P = 0.02]. Seven (20%) had rehospitalization during follow-up [29 (12-48) months], with ES recurrence in 6%.

conclusionsVA-ECMO bridged drug-refractory ES without a reversible trigger with a high success rate. This required prolonged hospital stays and coordination between the ECMO centre, the electrophysiology laboratory, and the heart transplant programme.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationTachycardia, VentricularAdultAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSpainSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsAntiarrhythmic drugsCatheter ablationElectrical stormExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationHeart transplantation

Identifiers

PMID38605602
PMCPMC11287318
OpenAlexW4394756363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.