Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38605438›Full record

ReviewTransplantation2024

The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation.

Camille N Kotton, Nassim Kamar, David Wojciechowski, Michael Eder, Helmut Hopfer, Parmjeet Randhawa, Martina Sester, Patrizia Comoli, Helio Tedesco Silva, Greg Knoll and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
34.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. A randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation phase I/II multicenter trial of low-dose cidofovir for BK polyomavirus nephropathy.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Camille N KottonTransplant and Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases Unit, Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Nassim KamarDepartment of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, INSERM UMR 1291, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
David WojciechowskiDepartment of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Michael EderDivision of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Helmut HopferDivision of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Parmjeet RandhawaDivision of Transplantation Pathology, The Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Martina SesterDepartment of Transplant and Infection Immunology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Patrizia ComoliCell Factory and Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Unit, Department of Mother and Child Health, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Helio Tedesco SilvaDivision of Nephrology, Hospital do Rim, Fundação Oswaldo Ramos, Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Greg KnollDepartment of Medicine (Nephrology), University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Daniel C BrennanJohns-Hopkins Comprehensive Transplant Center, Baltimore, MD.
Jennifer Trofe-ClarkRenal-Electrolyte Hypertension Division, Associated Faculty of the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA.
Lars PapePediatrics II, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
David AxelrodKidney, Pancreas, and Living Donor Transplant Programs at University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Bryce KiberdDivision of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Germaine WongSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Hans H HirschDivision of Transplantation and Clinical Virology, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Transplantation Society International BK Polyomavirus Consensus Group
Dalhousie University · CAMedical University of Vienna · ATSaarland University · DEThe University of Sydney · AUThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.

Indexed as

BK VirusConsensusImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney TransplantationPolyomavirus InfectionsPractice Guidelines as TopicTumor Virus InfectionsAntiviral AgentsHumansRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntiviral AgentsImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID38605438
PMCPMC11335089
OpenAlexW4394757906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.