Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38605392›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024

Minimal clinically important differences in six-minute walking distance in late-onset Pompe disease.

Kristl G Claeys, Hani Kushlaf, Syed Raza, Noemi Hummel, Simon Shohet, Ian Keyzor, Agnieszka Kopiec, Ryan Graham, Brian Fox, Benedikt Schoser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Kristl G ClaeysDepartment of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Hani KushlafUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Syed RazaAmicus Therapeutics, Ltd., Marlow, UK.
Noemi HummelCertara GmbH, Lörrach, Germany.
Simon ShohetAmicus Therapeutics, Ltd., Marlow, UK.
Ian KeyzorAmicus Therapeutics, Ltd., Marlow, UK.
Agnieszka Kopiec, Certara, Krakow, Poland.
Ryan GrahamAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.
Brian FoxAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.
Benedikt SchoserDepartment of Neurology, Friedrich-Baur-Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. bschoser@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2757-8131
Amicus Therapeutics (United Kingdom) · GBAmicus Therapeutics (United States) · USFriedrich Baur Stiftung · DEUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity School of Physical Education in Kraków · PLVIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is the smallest change in outcome that physicians or patients would consider meaningful and is relevant when evaluating disease progression or the efficacy of interventions. Studies of patients with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) have used the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) as an endpoint to assess motor function. However, an MCID for 6MWD (% predicted and meters) has yet to be established in LOPD. The objective of the study was to derive 6MWD MCID (% predicted and meters) with different analysis methods and for subgroups of different disease severity for LOPD.

methodsData from the PROPEL trial were used to calculate 6MWD MCID in the overall PROPEL population and subgroups of baseline severity as assessed by walking distance and body mass index (BMI), using anchor- and distribution-based approaches.

resultsThe 6MWD MCIDs varied widely, depending on the method and subgroup, ranging from 2.27%-8.11% predicted for the overall LOPD population (23.7 m-57.2 m). For patients with baseline 6MWD < 150 m, MCIDs ranged from -0.74%-3.37% (-2.1 m-11.3 m). MCIDs increased with distance walked at baseline until a plateau was reached. For BMI subgroups, the MCIDs were generally lowest in obese patients.

conclusionOur analysis shows that MCID depends on the chosen method and disease severity. The findings suggest that applying a single MCID to all patients can be misleading; consequently, a range of possible MCIDs should be considered. This may also be highly relevant for other neuromuscular diseases. This study provides a range of 6MWD MCIDs for LOPD, with lower MCIDs for more severe patients.

Indexed as

Glycogen Storage Disease Type IIClinical Trials as TopicDisease ProgressionHumansMinimal Clinically Important DifferenceWalking6MWDDisease severityLate-onset Pompe diseaseMCIDMinimal clinically important differenceSix-minute walk distance

Identifiers

PMID38605392
PMCPMC11008008
OpenAlexW4394726081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.