Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38605387›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2024

The impact of incentive scheme on rural healthcare workforce availability: a case study of Kazakhstan.

Bagym Jobalayeva, Zaituna Khismetova, Natalya Glushkova, Zhanat Kozhekenova, Akerke Abzaliyeva, Duman Berikuly, Yuliya Semenova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bagym JobalayevaDepartment of Public Health, JSC "Semey Medical University", Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Zaituna KhismetovaDepartment of Public Health, JSC "Semey Medical University", Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Natalya GlushkovaDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Evidence Based Medicine, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Zhanat KozhekenovaDepartment of Public Health, JSC "Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University", Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Akerke AbzaliyevaDepartment of Public Health and Social Sciences, "Kazakhstan School of Public Health", Kazakhstan's Medical University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Duman BerikulyDeputy Chairperson of the Board for Clinic and Postgraduate Education, JSC "Semey Medical University", Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Yuliya SemenovaNazarbayev University School of Medicine, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan. yuliya.semenova@nu.edu.kz.ORCID 0000-0003-1324-7806

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the 1990-2000, Kazakhstan experienced a decline in the number of healthcare professionals working in rural areas. Since 2009, the national government has been implementing financial incentives to encourage healthcare professionals to relocate to rural areas. This study aims to investigate the temporal and spatial patterns in the distribution of the rural healthcare workforce and evaluate the impact of this incentive scheme.

methodsInterrupted Time Series Analysis using ARIMA models and Difference in Differences analyzes were conducted to examine the impact of the incentive scheme on the density of different categories of the healthcare workforce in rural Kazakhstan in the period from 2009 to 2020.

resultsThere was a significant increase in the number of rural healthcare professionals from 2009 to 2020 in comparison to the period from 1998 to 2008. However, this increase was less pronounced in per capita terms. Moreover, a decline in the density of internists and pediatricians was observed. There is substantial variation in the density of rural nurses and physicians across different regions of Kazakhstan. The incentive scheme introduced in 2009 by the government of Kazakhstan included a one-time allowance and housing incentive. This scheme was found to have contributed insignificantly to the observed increase in the number of rural healthcare professionals.

conclusionFuture research should be undertaken to examine the impact made by the incentive scheme on other medical subspecialties, particularly primary practitioners. Addressing the shortage of healthcare workers in rural areas is a complex issue that requires a multifaceted approach. Aside from financial incentives, other policies could be considered to increase relocation and improve the retention of healthcare professionals in rural areas.

Indexed as

MotivationRural Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansKazakhstanWorkforceIncentive schemeInterrupted time series analysisKazakhstanNursesPhysiciansRural health

Identifiers

PMID38605387
PMCPMC11010400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.