Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38605382›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2024

Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE): how valuable and how hard? An evaluation of ALL_EARS@UoS PPIE group, 18 months on.

Kate Hough, Mary Grasmeder, Heather Parsons, William B Jones, Sarah Smith, Chris Satchwell, Ian Hobday, Sarah Taylor, Tracey Newman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in Otolaryngology research: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Evaluating Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement Activity Within the 3DPiPPIn Trial: A Qualitative Exploration of Contributors' Perspectives on Their Impact.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kate HoughClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5160-2517
Mary GrasmederAuditory Implant Service, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9020-328X
Heather ParsonsNIHR Research Design Service, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
William B JonesWessex Public Involvement Network, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2170-9153
Sarah SmithALL_EARS@UoS PPIE Group Member, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Chris SatchwellALL_EARS@UoS PPIE Group Member, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Ian HobdayALL_EARS@UoS PPIE Group Member, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Sarah TaylorALL_EARS@UoS PPIE Group Member, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Tracey NewmanClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. T.A.Newman@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3727-9258
University of Southampton · GBNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/W018764/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundALL_EARS@UoS is a patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) group for people with lived experience of hearing loss. The purpose of the group is to share experiences of hearing loss and hearing healthcare, inform research and improve services for patients at University of Southampton Auditory Implant Service. A year after inception, we wanted to critically reflect on the value and challenges of the group. Four members of ALL_EARS@UoS were recruited to an evaluation steering group. This paper reports the evaluation of the group using the UK Standards for Public Involvement.

methodsAn anonymous, mixed-methods questionnaire was co-designed and shared with members of ALL_EARS@UoS using an online platform. The questionnaire was designed to capture satisfaction, individual feedback through free-text answers, and demographic information. Descriptive statistics have been used to express the satisfaction and demographic data. Reflexive thematic analysis has been used to analyse the free-text responses. Group engagement and activity data over time were monitored and collected.

resultsThe questionnaire response rate was 61% (11/18). Areas identified as strengths were 'Communication' and 'Working together'. Five themes were developed from the thematic analysis; (1) Increased knowledge and awareness around the topic of hearing health for group members and wider society, (2) supporting research, (3) inclusivity within the group, (4) opportunity to make a difference for people in the future and (5) running of the group/group organisation. The data highlighted the value and challenges of PPIE. Members described feeling listened to and appreciation of being able to share experiences. Time of day and meeting format were identified as challenges as they affected who could attend the meetings. The ability to secure and maintain sufficient funding and time to support inclusive and diverse PPIE activities is a challenge for researchers.

conclusionsWe have identified how PPIE added value to both group members and researchers, emphasising the true benefit of PPIE. We have highlighted challenges we are facing and our plan to tackle these. We aim to continue to develop and sustain a group that reflects the diversity of the Deaf/deaf or hard of hearing community and of our local community.

Indexed as

AudiologyCommunity engagementEvaluationHearing lossPatient and public involvementStandards

Identifiers

PMID38605382
PMCPMC11010367
OpenAlexW4394726493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.