Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38605373›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Applying the UTAUT2 framework to patients' attitudes toward healthcare task shifting with artificial intelligence.

Weiting Huang, Wen Chong Ong, Mark Kei Fong Wong, Eddie Yin Kwee Ng, Tracy Koh, Chanchal Chandramouli, Choon Ta Ng, Yoran Hummel, Feiqiong Huang, Carolyn Su Ping Lam and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Developing a Typology of Women's Attitudes Towards AI Use in the BreastScreen Programme-A Qualitative Study With BreastScreen Victoria Clients.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Weiting HuangNational Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169609, Singapore. huang.weiting@singhealth.com.sg.
Wen Chong OngNational Healthcare Group Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.
Mark Kei Fong WongSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Eddie Yin Kwee NgSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Tracy KohNational Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169609, Singapore.
Chanchal ChandramouliNational Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169609, Singapore.
Choon Ta NgNational Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169609, Singapore.
Yoran Hummel, Us2.ai, Singapore, Singapore.
Feiqiong Huang, Us2.ai, Singapore, Singapore.
Carolyn Su Ping LamNational Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169609, Singapore.
Jasper TrompDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
National Heart Centre Singapore · SGDuke-NUS Medical School · SGNanyang Technological University · SGNational University of Singapore · SGSingHealth Polyclinics · SG

Funding

Singapore Ministry of Health's National Medical Research Council and AstraZeneca OF-YIRG (MOH-000941-00)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing patient loads, healthcare inflation and ageing population have put pressure on the healthcare system. Artificial intelligence and machine learning innovations can aid in task shifting to help healthcare systems remain efficient and cost effective. To gain an understanding of patients' acceptance toward such task shifting with the aid of AI, this study adapted the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2), looking at performance and effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, social influence, hedonic motivation and behavioural intention.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study which took place between September 2021 to June 2022 at the National Heart Centre, Singapore. One hundred patients, aged ≥ 21 years with at least one heart failure symptom (pedal oedema, New York Heart Association II-III effort limitation, orthopnoea, breathlessness), who presented to the cardiac imaging laboratory for physician-ordered clinical echocardiogram, underwent both echocardiogram by skilled sonographers and the experience of echocardiogram by a novice guided by AI technologies. They were then given a survey which looked at the above-mentioned constructs using the UTAUT2 framework.

resultsSignificant, direct, and positive effects of all constructs on the behavioral intention of accepting the AI-novice combination were found. Facilitating conditions, hedonic motivation and performance expectancy were the top 3 constructs. The analysis of the moderating variables, age, gender and education levels, found no impact on behavioral intention.

conclusionsThese results are important for stakeholders and changemakers such as policymakers, governments, physicians, and insurance companies, as they design adoption strategies to ensure successful patient engagement by focusing on factors affecting the facilitating conditions, hedonic motivation and performance expectancy for AI technologies used in healthcare task shifting.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceTask ShiftingAttitudeCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPatient ParticipationEchocardiographyHealthcare artificial intelligenceMachine learningPatient attitudesPoint-of-care ultrasoundTask shiftingTechnology acceptance

Identifiers

PMID38605373
PMCPMC11007870
OpenAlexW4394720604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.