Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38605342›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2024

Perceptions of medical students on narrow learning objectives and structured debriefing in medical escape rooms: a qualitative study.

Tami Jørgensen, Oscar Rosenkrantz, Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard, Theo Walther Jensen, Peter Dieckmann

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04783259 (Exploring the Views of Medical Students on Medical Escape Room Experiences With Narrow Learning Objectives and Structured Debriefings), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04783259 naunknown statusnot on this map

Exploring the Views of Medical Students on Medical Escape Room Experiences With Narrow Learning Objectives and Structured Debriefings

TypeinterventionalSponsorCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and SimulationRan2021 to 2021Enrolled45ConditionsInteractive TeachingArmsStructured approach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tami JørgensenCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Capital Region of Denmark, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Copenhagen, Denmark. tami.joergensen@hotmail.com.
Oscar RosenkrantzCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Capital Region of Denmark, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kristine Elisabeth EberhardCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Capital Region of Denmark, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Theo Walther JensenCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Capital Region of Denmark, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter DieckmannCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Capital Region of Denmark, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEscape rooms are increasingly used in medical education as a complementary learning technique or even alternative to traditional educational approaches. Few studies focus on debriefing following medical escape rooms and how escape rooms can be used to achieve pre-defined learning objectives. Evaluating the use of narrow learning objectives may increase the depth of reflections and transform an engaging team event into an effective learning opportunity. This study aimed to explore participants' experiences and perceived learning outcomes of narrow learning objectives in a medical escape room with debriefing.

methodsIn this explorative, qualitative study, participants saw a video lecture, participated in an escape room experience, and in a following debriefing. Throughout this learning session, the learning objectives concerned "exchange of information" and are therefore relatively narrow. Participants then participated in a semi-structured focus group interview and completed a demographic questionnaire. Participants were volunteer final-year medical students. Focus group interview recordings were transcribed and analysed using systematic text condensation.

resultsThirty-two students in eight groups completed the study. Five themes were described in the analysis of the focus group interviews: Experience with the narrow learning objectives, topics discussed in the debriefing, learning mechanisms, learning outcomes concerning exchange of information and influences of the learning approach.

conclusionsNarrow learning objectives and structured debriefing seem to increase perceived learning depth of medical escape room sessions. Using semi-structured debriefing still allows for discussions of other elements relevant to the students. CLINICAL TRIALS: Clinical.trials ID NCT04783259.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalStudents, MedicalFocus GroupsHumansLearningQualitative ResearchDebriefingEscape roomGamificationInnovative teachingLearning objectives

Identifiers

PMID38605342
PMCPMC11010419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.