Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38605333›Full record

ReviewCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2024

The cost-effectiveness of school-based interventions for chronic diseases: a systematic review.

George Lin, Kalin Werner, Ada Alqunaiebet, Mariam M Hamza, Norah Alkanhal, Reem F Alsukait, Amaal Alruwaily, Severin Rakic, Volkan Cetinkaya, Christopher H Herbst and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

George Lin *Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kalin Werner *Institute for Health & Aging, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ada AlqunaiebetSaudi Public Health Authority, Riyadh, KSA, Saudi Arabia.
Mariam M HamzaHealth, Nutrition and Population Global Practice, The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Norah AlkanhalSaudi Public Health Authority, Riyadh, KSA, Saudi Arabia.
Reem F AlsukaitCollege of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Amaal AlruwailySaudi Public Health Authority, Riyadh, KSA, Saudi Arabia.
Severin RakicHealth, Nutrition and Population Global Practice, The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5401-3614
Volkan CetinkayaHealth, Nutrition and Population Global Practice, The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Christopher H HerbstHealth, Nutrition and Population Global Practice, The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Tracy Kuo LinInstitute for Health & Aging, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. tracy.lin@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6528-4564
World Bank · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USKing Saud University · SAStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic diseases, or non-communicable diseases (NCD), are conditions of long duration and often influenced and contributed by complex interactions of several variables, including genetic, physiological, environmental, and behavioral factors. These conditions contribute to death, disability, and subsequent health care costs. Primary and secondary school settings provide an opportunity to deliver relatively low cost and effective interventions to improve public health outcomes. However, there lacks systematic evidence on the cost-effectiveness of these interventions.

methodsWe systematically searched four databases (PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science) for published studies on the cost-effectiveness of chronic-disease interventions in school settings. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they assessed interventions of any chronic or non-communicable disease, were conducted in a school setting, undertook a full cost-effectiveness analysis and were available in English, Spanish, or French.

resultsOur review identified 1029 articles during our initial search of the databases, and after screening, 33 studies were included in our final analysis. The most used effectiveness outcome measures were summary effectiveness units such as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (22 articles; 67%) or disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) (4 articles; 12%). The most common health condition for which an intervention targets is overweight and obesity. Almost all school-based interventions were found to be cost-effective (30 articles; 81%).

conclusionOur review found evidence to support a number of cost-effective school-based interventions targeting NCDs focused on vaccination, routine physical activity, and supplement delivery interventions. Conversely, many classroom-based cognitive behavioral therapy for mental health and certain multi-component interventions for obesity were not found to be cost-effective.

Indexed as

Chronic diseasesCost-effectivenessNon-communicable diseasesSchoolSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38605333
PMCPMC11008027
OpenAlexW4394718900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.