SynthesisBMC health services research2024
The role of champions in the implementation of technology in healthcare services: a systematic mixed studies review.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Enhancing digital readiness and capability in healthcare: a systematic review of interventions, barriers, and facilitators.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Person-centered shared decision-making and data-informed district nursing care to enhance independence: Protocol for a feasibility study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Exploring facilitators and barriers to the implementation of prehabilitation for individuals with pancreatic cancer: a survey of healthcare professionals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Enabling Fresh-Produce Availability in Long-Term Care via Hydroponic Green Walls: A Multisite Operational and Cost Evaluation.Nutrients · 2026Observational
- Harnessing institutional knowledge: mixed methods evaluation of peer coaching in a multi-site EHR transition.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Enhancing organizational resilience of emergency medical services through a designated intervention program.Israel journal of health policy research · 2026Article
- Learning from scale-up: a qualitative study of scaling-up interventions for people with multiple long-term conditions in primary care.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026Article
- The implementation of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a qualitative study.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Identifying dissemination strategies for promoting adoption of digital health interventions in clinical settings: A convergent parallel study on text message support for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- The Digital Competences of Exercise Therapists in Obesity Care: A Step Towards Digital Sovereignty Assessed with the DigCompThExO Questionnaire.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Harnessing the power of virtual reality technology to enhance public health genomics skills in Africa.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Preparing clinical champions for sustainable implementation of practice change within large healthcare systems.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Exploring barriers to the sustainable implementation of an evidence-based program for preventing deep vein thrombosis in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).BMC health services research · 2026Article
- From fragmentation to integration: the implementation of Kuwait's nationwide pediatric intensive care units registry.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Exploring Factors Associated With the Stalled Implementation of a Ground-Up Electronic Health Record System in South Africa: Qualitative Insights From the E-Tick Case Study Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards iron deficiency anemia among paramedical college staff and students in a Saudi university: an online cross-sectional survey.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Implementation of a nursing assessment framework in the postanesthesia care unit: a pre-post implementation design.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Understanding digital inclusion through the transformation of services and users: a narrative review and novel framework.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Review
- Implementation of Ambient AI Scribes in Hospitals: Lessons for Healthcare Leadership, Governance, and Change Management.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Review
- Qualitative Evaluation of an Online Technology to Support Rural Caregivers of People with Dementia.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChampions play a critical role in implementing technology within healthcare services. While prior studies have explored the presence and characteristics of champions, this review delves into the experiences of healthcare personnel holding champion roles, as well as the experiences of healthcare personnel interacting with them. By synthesizing existing knowledge, this review aims to inform decisions regarding the inclusion of champions as a strategy in technology implementation and guide healthcare personnel in these roles.
methodsA systematic mixed studies review, covering qualitative, quantitative, or mixed designs, was conducted from September 2022 to March 2023. The search spanned Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus, focusing on studies published from 2012 onwards. The review centered on health personnel serving as champions in technology implementation within healthcare services. Quality assessments utilized the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).
resultsFrom 1629 screened studies, 23 were included. The champion role was often examined within the broader context of technology implementation. Limited studies explicitly explored experiences related to the champion role from both champions' and health personnel's perspectives. Champions emerged as promoters of technology, supporting its adoption. Success factors included anchoring and selection processes, champions' expertise, and effective role performance. DISCUSSION: The specific tasks and responsibilities assigned to champions differed across reviewed studies, highlighting that the role of champion is a broad one, dependent on the technology being implemented and the site implementing it. Findings indicated a correlation between champion experiences and organizational characteristics. The role's firm anchoring within the organization is crucial. Limited evidence suggests that volunteering, hiring newly graduated health personnel, and having multiple champions can facilitate technology implementation. Existing studies predominantly focused on client health records and hospitals, emphasizing the need for broader research across healthcare services.
conclusionsWith a clear mandate, dedicated time, and proper training, health personnel in champion roles can significantly contribute professional, technological, and personal competencies to facilitate technology adoption within healthcare services. The review finds that the concept of champions is a broad one and finds varied definitions of the champion role concept. This underscores the importance of describing organizational characteristics, and highlights areas for future research to enhance technology implementation strategies in different healthcare settings with support of a champion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.