Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38605284›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024

Control of false discoveries in grouped hypothesis testing for eQTL data.

Pratyaydipta Rudra, Yi-Hui Zhou, Andrew Nobel, Fred A Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pratyaydipta RudraDepartment of Statistics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA. prudra@okstate.edu.
Yi-Hui ZhouBioinformatics Research Center, Departments of Statistics and Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Andrew NobelDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Fred A WrightBioinformatics Research Center, Departments of Statistics and Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. fred_wright@ncsu.edu.

Funding

Chromatin regions, genes and pathways that confer susceptibility to chemical-induced DNA damageR01ES029911 · NIEHS · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI RUSYN, IVAN, THREADGILL, DAVID W. · 2019 to 2023
$3.3M
Characterizing Gene-Environment Interactions that Affect Individual Susceptibility to an Expanding Chemical ExposomeR01ES033243 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Fred A. Wright · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES029911NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES033243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis aims to detect the genetic variants that influence the expression of one or more genes. Gene-level eQTL testing forms a natural grouped-hypothesis testing strategy with clear biological importance. Methods to control family-wise error rate or false discovery rate for group testing have been proposed earlier, but may not be powerful or easily apply to eQTL data, for which certain structured alternatives may be defensible and may enable the researcher to avoid overly conservative approaches.

resultsIn an empirical Bayesian setting, we propose a new method to control the false discovery rate (FDR) for grouped hypotheses. Here, each gene forms a group, with SNPs annotated to the gene corresponding to individual hypotheses. The heterogeneity of effect sizes in different groups is considered by the introduction of a random effects component. Our method, entitled Random Effects model and testing procedure for Group-level FDR control (REG-FDR), assumes a model for alternative hypotheses for the eQTL data and controls the FDR by adaptive thresholding. As a convenient alternate approach, we also propose Z-REG-FDR, an approximate version of REG-FDR, that uses only Z-statistics of association between genotype and expression for each gene-SNP pair. The performance of Z-REG-FDR is evaluated using both simulated and real data. Simulations demonstrate that Z-REG-FDR performs similarly to REG-FDR, but with much improved computational speed.

conclusionOur results demonstrate that the Z-REG-FDR method performs favorably compared to other methods in terms of statistical power and control of FDR. It can be of great practical use for grouped hypothesis testing for eQTL analysis or similar problems in statistical genomics due to its fast computation and ability to be fit using only summary data.

Indexed as

GenomicsQuantitative Trait LociBayes TheoremComputer SimulationGenotypeEmpirical BayeseQTLFalse discovery rateGrouped hypothesis testing

Identifiers

PMID38605284
PMCPMC11007981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.