Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38605262›Full record

ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2024

Slope between positive and negative ERG components in patients with open-angle glaucoma.

Maja Sustar Habjan, Barbara Cvenkel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maja Sustar HabjanDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Grabloviceva 46, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. maja.sustar@kclj.si.ORCID 0000-0001-6321-6931
Barbara CvenkelDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Grabloviceva 46, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ljubljana University Medical Centre · SIUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate ERG morphology, in particular the slope between P50 and N95 components of the PERG, as well as between the b-wave and the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the light-adapted (LA) ERG in patients with retinal ganglion cell (RGC) dysfunction due to open-angle glaucoma.

methodsThe PERG and LA-ERG traces of 16 glaucoma patients and 21 age-similar controls were retrospectively analysed. The ERG signal between the peak of the positive component (P50 and b-wave) towards the negative component (N95 and PhNR) was described by a linear regression y = a + bx, where the parameter b indicated the steepness of the P50-N95 and b-PhNR slope.

resultsThe P50-N95 slope was less steep in glaucoma patients (-0.079 ± 0.034 vs. -0.166 ± 0.050 in controls, p < 0.001), while the b-PhNR slope was not affected (-4.2 ± 2.1 vs. -4.4 ± 1.2, p = NS). The P50-N95 slope showed strong correlation with PhNR and N95 amplitude (r = -0.68 and -0.92, respectively; p < 0.001), while the b-PhNR slope correlated only with b-wave amplitude (r = -0.66, p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe P50-N95 slope is a sensitive indicator of RGC dysfunction in patients with open-angle glaucoma. A similar component of LA-ERG, the b-PhNR slope, is less affected by glaucomatous RGC dysfunction and probably originates from similar retinal mechanisms as the b-wave.

Indexed as

ElectroretinographyGlaucoma, Open-AngleIntraocular PressureRetinal Ganglion CellsVisual FieldsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationRetrospective StudiesGlaucomaPattern electroretinogramPhotopic negative responseRetinal ganglion cells

Identifiers

PMID38605262
OpenAlexW4394758044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.