SynthesisJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026
Brief Report: Single-Session Interventions for Mental Health Challenges in Autistic People: An (Almost) Empty Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-session interventions (specific, structured programs that intentionally involve just one visit or encounter with a clinic, provider, or program) have been proven to prevent or reduce mental health challenges and reduce barriers to access. This review aimed to identify and synthesise literature on the acceptability, feasibility, effectiveness, or efficacy of (non-pharmacological) single-session interventions for autistic people. Four databases (Scopus, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and ProQuest) were searched in 12.7.2023, with no date restrictions. Search terms were selected to identify articles reporting on single-session interventions in autistic people. Two raters screened titles/abstracts of 286 articles and full text of 17 articles, resulting in just two included articles, reporting on 46 participants. Risk of bias was assessed with the Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies (QuADS). The two included papers report on specific techniques taught within a single visit to a clinic using pre- and immediate post-intervention questionnaires. One study also reported on cortisol levels pre and post. Neither study reported on acceptability or feasibility of single-session interventions. However, there was insufficient quality evidence to evaluate the effectiveness or efficacy of single-session interventions for autistic people. Although there is substantial research on single-session interventions in the broader population, there is a lack of research into such approaches for autistic people. This is a missed opportunity to evaluate a potential means of support for those at elevated risk of mental health challenges and unmet mental health service need. Future research should co-produce and co-evaluate such approaches as a priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38605188What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.