Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38605140›Full record

ReviewHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2024

Impact of renal denervation on quality of life (How does renal denervation contribute to improving hypertension treatment affected by poor medication adherence?).

Keisuke Okamura, Hideaki Shimada, Keisuke Imazato, Hideto Sako, Akihiro Udo, Kenichiro Taniguchi, Shogo Morisaki, Ichiro Imamura, Hidenori Urata, Hisatomi Arima and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Keisuke OkamuraDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Center, Imamura Hospital, Tosu, Saga, Japan. okamurakmd@cis.fukuoka-u.ac.jp.
Hideaki ShimadaDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikushino, Fukuoka, Japan.
Keisuke ImazatoDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Center, Imamura Hospital, Tosu, Saga, Japan.
Hideto SakoDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Center, Imamura Hospital, Tosu, Saga, Japan.
Akihiro UdoDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Center, Imamura Hospital, Tosu, Saga, Japan.
Kenichiro TaniguchiDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Center, Imamura Hospital, Tosu, Saga, Japan.
Shogo MorisakiDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Center, Imamura Hospital, Tosu, Saga, Japan.
Ichiro ImamuraDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Center, Imamura Hospital, Tosu, Saga, Japan.
Hidenori UrataDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikushino, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hisatomi ArimaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shin-Ichiro MiuraDepartment of Cardiology, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan.
Imamura Hospital · JPFukuoka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The US Food and Drug Administration has approved renal denervation (RDN) as a new treatment option for hypertension (HT) because it not only has antihypertensive effects but also improves the quality of blood pressure (BP) reduction. RDN is expected to be increasingly used in clinical practice in the future. This review summarizes the impact of RDN on quality of life (QOL). Although the treatment of HT aims to improve life prognosis, the use of antihypertensive agents can impair QOL because of adverse effects and lifestyle changes associated with long-term medication use. Consequently, poor adherence to antihypertensive agents is a common problem and may be the most important issue affecting patient QOL. In RDN trials in patients taking antihypertensive agents, approximately 40% of patients had poor adherence to the drugs. Poor adherence is often the cause of resistant hypertension. Therefore, RDN should be well suited to treating HT and improving QOL. Studies have shown that approximately 30% of HT patients prefer RDN to drug treatment. Patients who prefer RDN are typically male and younger and have high BP, poor adherence, and a history of adverse effects of antihypertensive agents. We hope that RDN will improve not only life prognosis but also QOL in HT patients because of its benefits for adherence. Furthermore, we expect that in the future, RDN will be used in other sympathetic nervous system-related diseases, such as heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and sleep apnea syndrome.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsHypertensionKidneyMedication AdherenceQuality of LifeDenervationHumansSympathectomyAntihypertensive AgentsAdherenceCatheter-based renal sympathetic denervationClinical TrialHumansHypertensionPreferenceQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID38605140
OpenAlexW4394718559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.