ArticleScientific reports2024
Interpretable detection of epiretinal membrane from optical coherence tomography with deep neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- DenseViT-OCT: A Hybrid CNN-Transformer Architecture with Multi-Scale Dense Feature Aggregation for Automated Epiretinal Membrane Severity Classification.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- In-Context Learning for Data-Efficient Diabetic Retinopathy Detection via Multimodal Foundation Models.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Discriminative, generative artificial intelligence, and foundation models in retina imaging.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Epiretinal Membrane Care: A Scoping Review.Ophthalmology scienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to automatically detect epiretinal membranes (ERM) in various OCT-scans of the central and paracentral macula region and classify them by size using deep-neural-networks (DNNs). To this end, 11,061 OCT-images were included and graded according to the presence of an ERM and its size (small 100-1000 µm, large > 1000 µm). The data set was divided into training, validation and test sets (75%, 10%, 15% of the data, respectively). An ensemble of DNNs was trained and saliency maps were generated using Guided-Backprob. OCT-scans were also transformed into a one-dimensional-value using t-SNE analysis. The DNNs' receiver-operating-characteristics on the test set showed a high performance for no-ERM, small-ERM and large-ERM cases (AUC: 0.99, 0.92, 0.99, respectively; 3-way accuracy: 89%), with small-ERMs being the most difficult ones to detect. t-SNE analysis sorted cases by size and, in particular, revealed increased classification uncertainty at the transitions between groups. Saliency maps reliably highlighted ERM, regardless of the presence of other OCT features (i.e. retinal-thickening, intraretinal pseudo-cysts, epiretinal-proliferation) and entities such as ERM-retinoschisis, macular-pseudohole and lamellar-macular-hole. This study showed therefore that DNNs can reliably detect and grade ERMs according to their size not only in the fovea but also in the paracentral region. This is also achieved in cases of hard-to-detect, small-ERMs. In addition, the generated saliency maps can be used to highlight small-ERMs that might otherwise be missed. The proposed model could be used for screening-programs or decision-support-systems in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.