Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38605002›Full record

ReviewTranslational psychiatry2024

An updated review on animal models to study attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Daegeon Kim, Dhananjay Yadav, Minseok Song

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Behavioral and Prefrontal Circuit Deficits in a Newly DevelopedBiological psychiatry global open science · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Interaction Between Oxytocin and Dopamine Signaling: Focus on the Striatum.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daegeon Kim *Department of Life Science, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si, South Korea.
Dhananjay Yadav *Department of Life Science, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si, South Korea.
Minseok SongDepartment of Life Science, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si, South Korea. minseok@yu.ac.kr.
Yeungnam University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) NRF-2021R1I1A3055750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neuropsychiatric disorder affecting both children and adolescents. Individuals with ADHD experience heterogeneous problems, such as difficulty in attention, behavioral hyperactivity, and impulsivity. Recent studies have shown that complex genetic factors play a role in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders. Animal models with clear hereditary traits are crucial for studying the molecular, biological, and brain circuit mechanisms underlying ADHD. Owing to their well-managed genetic origins and the relative simplicity with which the function of neuronal circuits is clearly established, models of mice can help learn the mechanisms involved in ADHD. Therefore, in this review, we highlighting the important genetic animal models that can be used to study ADHD.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityAdolescentAnimalsAttentionChildDisease Models, AnimalHumansImpulsive BehaviorLearningMice

Identifiers

PMID38605002
PMCPMC11009407
OpenAlexW4394725035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.