Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38604810›Full record

Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2024

Treatment-free survival outcomes from the phase II study of nivolumab and salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (HCRN GU16-260-Cohort A).

Michael B Atkins, Opeyemi A Jegede, Naomi B Haas, David F Mcdermott, Mehmet A Bilen, Mark Stein, Jeffrey Sosman, Robert Alter, Elizabeth R Plimack, Moshe C Ornstein and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Michael B AtkinsOncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA mba41@Georgetown.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3901-9924
Opeyemi A JegedeBiostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Naomi B HaasMedicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
David F McdermottMedicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mehmet A BilenDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4003-1103
Mark SteinColumbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Jeffrey SosmanNorthwestern University Department of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Robert AlterJohn Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA.
Elizabeth R PlimackFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Moshe C OrnsteinTaussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0184-3467
Michael HurwitzMedical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
David J PeaceMedicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
David EinsteinMedicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9163-3281
Paul J CatalanoBiostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hans HammersThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Meredith M ReganBiostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2428-6109
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USEmory University · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USGeorgetown University · USHackensack University Medical Center · USNorthwestern University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Pennsylvania Health System · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Treating the P13-Kinase/AKTP50CA101942 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Wanling Xie · 2003 to 2026
$53.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS P50 CA101942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs part of a partitioned survival analysis, treatment-free survival (TFS) can characterize the overall survival time patients spend between the cessation of immunotherapy and the start of subsequent therapy; both with and without toxicity. Significant TFS was reported for the nivolumab/ipilimumab arms of the CheckMate 067 and 214 trials for patients with advanced melanoma or renal cell carcinoma (aRCC), respectively, where immunotherapy was often halted for toxicity rather than a predefined treatment endpoint. We therefore sought to assess TFS in the HCRN GU16-260 trial, which was designed to reduce toxicity and cap immunotherapy duration.

methodsData were analyzed from 128 patients with clear-cell aRCC treated with first-line nivolumab monotherapy for up to 2 years. Salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab for up to 1 year was provided to eligible patients with disease progression at any point or stable disease at 48 weeks (29% of patients). TFS was defined as the area between Kaplan-Meier curves for a time from registration to protocol therapy cessation and for a time from registration to subsequent systemic therapy initiation or death, estimated from 36-month mean times. The time on or off protocol treatment with grade 3+treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was also captured.

resultsAt 36 months from enrollment, 68.3% of patients were alive: 96.8% of International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) favorable-risk patients and 56.6% of those with intermediate/poor-risk, respectively. The 36-month mean time on protocol therapy was 11.5 months including 0.6 months with grade 3+TRAEs (16.0 months for favorable-risk patients and 9.6 months for intermediated/poor-risk patients). The 36-month mean TFS for the whole population was 9.4 months (12.9 months including 1.5 months with grade 3+TRAEs for favorable-risk and 8.0 months including 1.0 months with grade 3+TRAEs for intermediate/poor-risk). At 36 months, 65.6% of favorable-risk patients and 27.1% of intermediate/poor-risk patients were alive and subsequent systemic treatment-free.

conclusionsNivolumab monotherapy with salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab in non-responders is an active treatment approach in treatment-naïve patients with aRCC and, similar to nivolumab/ipilimumab in CheckMate 214, results in substantial TFS and toxicity-free TFS. TFS was greatest in patients with favorable-risk disease, supporting the use of an immunotherapy-only regimen in this population.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsMelanomaHumansIpilimumabNivolumabIpilimumabNivolumabClinical Trials as TopicImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyRenal Cell Carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID38604810
PMCPMC11015345
OpenAlexW4394759448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.