Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38604637›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Point-of-choice kilocalorie labelling practices in large, out-of-home food businesses: a preobservational versus post observational study of labelling practices following implementation of The Calorie Labelling (Out of Home Sector) (England) Regulations 2021.

Megan Polden, Andrew Jones, Michael Essman, Jean Adams, Tom Bishop, Thomas Burgoine, Aisling Donohue, Stephen Sharp, Martin White, Richard Smith and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Calorie labelling and other drivers of takeaway food choices.BMJ nutrition, prevention & health · 2025
    Article
  12. Does menu calorie labelling cause or exacerbate eating disorders?International journal of obesity (2005) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Megan PoldenDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK m.polden@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1813-0765
Andrew JonesLiverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Michael EssmanMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5017-3880
Jean AdamsMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Tom BishopMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Thomas BurgoineMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Aisling DonohueLiverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Stephen SharpMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Martin WhiteMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Richard SmithInstitute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon, UK.
Eric RobinsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesOn 6 April 2022, the UK government implemented mandatory kilocalorie (kcal) labelling regulations for food and drink products sold in the out-of-home food sector (OHFS) in England. Previous assessments of kcal labelling practices in the UK OHFS found a low prevalence of voluntary implementation and poor compliance with labelling recommendations. This study aimed to examine changes in labelling practices preimplementation versus post implementation of mandatory labelling regulations in 2022.

methodsIn August-December 2021 (preimplementation) and August-November 2022 (post implementation), large OHFS businesses (250 or more employees) subject to labelling regulations were visited. At two time points, a researcher visited the same 117 food outlets (belonging to 90 unique businesses) across four local authorities in England. Outlets were rated for compliance with government regulations for whether kcal labelling was provided at any or all point of choice, provided for all eligible food and drink items, provided per portion for sharing items, if labelling was clear and legible and if kcal reference information was displayed.

resultsThere was a significant increase (21% preimplementation vs 80% post implementation, OR=40.98 (95% CI 8.08 to 207.74), p<0.001) in the proportion of outlets providing any kcal labelling at point-of-choice post implementation. Only 15% of outlets met all labelling compliance criteria post implementation, with a minority of outlets not presenting labelling in a clear (33%) or legible (29%) way.

conclusionThe number of large businesses in the OHFS providing kcal labelling increased following the implementation of mandatory labelling regulations. However, around one-fifth of eligible outlets sampled were not providing kcal labelling 4-8 months after the regulations came into force, and the majority of businesses only partially complied with government guidance. More effective enforcement may be required to further improve kcal labelling practices in the OHFS in England. PREREGISTRATION: Study protocol and analysis strategy preregistered on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/pfnm6/).

Indexed as

FoodRestaurantsCommerceEnergy IntakeEnglandHumansHealth policyNutritionObesityPublic health

Identifiers

PMID38604637
PMCPMC11015320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.