ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2024
Early prediction of long hospital stay for Intensive Care units readmission patients using medication information.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Models for ICU Length of Stay Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Utilization of Artificial Intelligence in Reducing the Incidence of Medication Error: A Bibliometric Analysis.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Design and Development of a Machine Learning Model for Predicting ICU Patients' Length of Stay.Cureus · 2025Article
- Early Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay Prediction on MIMIC-IV: A Dual Approach With Clinical Features and Textual Notes.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePredicting Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of Stay (LOS) accurately can improve patient wellness, hospital operations, and the health system's financial status. This study focuses on predicting the prolonged ICU LOS (≥3 days) of the 2nd admission, utilizing short historical data (1st admission only) for early-stage prediction, as well as incorporating medication information. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe selected 18,572 ICU patients' records from the MIMIC-IV database for this study. We applied five machine learning classifiers: Logistic regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), AdaBoost (AB) and XGBoost (XGB). We computed both the sum dose and the average dose for the medication and included them in our model.
resultsThe performance of the RF model demonstrates the highest level of accuracy compared to other models, as indicated by an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) of 0.716 and an Expected Calibration Error (ECE) of 0.023. DISCUSSION: The calibration improved all five classifiers (LR, RF, SVC, AB, XGB) in terms of ECE. The most important two features for RF are the length of 1st admission and the patient's age when they visited the hospital. The most important medication features are Phytonadione and Metoprolol Succinate XL. Also, both the sum and the average dose for the medication features contributed to the prediction task.
conclusionOur model showed the capability to predict the prolonged ICU LOS of the 2nd admission by utilizing the demographic, diagnosis, and medication information from the 1st admission. This method can potentially support the prevention of patient complications and enhance resource allocation in hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.