Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38603714›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Bacterial diversity and composition on the rinds of specific melon cultivars and hybrids from across different growing regions in the United States.

Madison Goforth, Victoria Obergh, Richard Park, Martin Porchas, Kevin M Crosby, John L Jifon, Sadhana Ravishankar, Paul Brierley, Daniel L Leskovar, Thomas A Turini and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Madison GoforthSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.
Victoria OberghSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9030-8695
Richard ParkSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.
Martin PorchasUSDA National Center of Excellence for Melon at the Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Kevin M CrosbyUSDA National Center of Excellence for Melon at the Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
John L JifonUSDA National Center of Excellence for Melon at the Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Sadhana RavishankarSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.
Paul BrierleyUSDA National Center of Excellence for Melon at the Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Daniel L LeskovarUSDA National Center of Excellence for Melon at the Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Thomas A TuriniUSDA National Center of Excellence for Melon at the Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Jonathan SchultheisUSDA National Center of Excellence for Melon at the Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Timothy CoolongUSDA National Center of Excellence for Melon at the Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Rhonda MillerUSDA National Center of Excellence for Melon at the Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Hisashi KoiwaUSDA National Center of Excellence for Melon at the Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Bhimanagouda S PatilUSDA National Center of Excellence for Melon at the Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Margarethe A CooperSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.
Steven HuynhProduce Safety and Microbiology, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Albany, CA, United States of America.
Craig T ParkerProduce Safety and Microbiology, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Albany, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7719-8882
Wenjing GuanUSDA National Center of Excellence for Melon at the Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Kerry K CooperUSDA National Center of Excellence for Melon at the Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4541-1324

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to characterize the bacterial diversity on different melon varieties grown in different regions of the US, and determine the influence that region, rind netting, and variety of melon has on the composition of the melon microbiome. Assessing the bacterial diversity of the microbiome on the melon rind can identify antagonistic and protagonistic bacteria for foodborne pathogens and spoilage organisms to improve melon safety, prolong shelf-life, and/or improve overall plant health. Bacterial community composition of melons (n = 603) grown in seven locations over a four-year period were used for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and analysis to identify bacterial diversity and constituents. Statistically significant differences in alpha diversity based on the rind netting and growing region (p < 0.01) were found among the melon samples. Principal Coordinate Analysis based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity distance matrix found that the melon bacterial communities clustered more by region rather than melon variety (R2 value: 0.09 & R2 value: 0.02 respectively). Taxonomic profiling among the growing regions found Enterobacteriaceae, Bacillaceae, Microbacteriaceae, and Pseudomonadaceae present on the different melon rinds at an abundance of ≥ 0.1%, but no specific core microbiome was found for netted melons. However, a core of Pseudomonadaceae, Bacillaceae, and Exiguobacteraceae were found for non-netted melons. The results of this study indicate that bacterial diversity is driven more by the region that the melons were grown in compared to rind netting or melon type. Establishing the foundation for regional differences could improve melon safety, shelf-life, and quality as well as the consumers' health.

Indexed as

BacillaceaeCucumis meloCucurbitaceaeBacteriaEnterobacteriaceaeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SUnited StatesRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID38603714
PMCPMC11008840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.