Observational studyPloS one2024
Machine learning for prediction of acute kidney injury in patients diagnosed with sepsis in critical care.
Observational study in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction models for sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Risk prediction of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: development, validation of a machine learning model with multicenter data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Dissecting the pathobiology of suspected sepsis through a comparative analysis of endothelial inflammatory and clinical prediction models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Leveraging ICT Tools to Improve Kidney Health: A Comprehensive Review of Innovations in Nephrology.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine learning early risk assessment model for acute kidney injury in critically ill children: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Immune cell profiling supports early prediction of sepsis-associated acute kidney disease using a decision tree algorithm.Biomarker research · 2025Article
- Prediction of Moderate-to-Severe Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Using a Dual-Timepoint Machine Learning Model: Development, Multiregional Validation, and Clinical Deployment Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Review
- Bug Wars: Artificial Intelligence Strikes Back in Sepsis Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Establishment and validation of the prediction model based on lymphocyte subsets for acute kidney injury in sepsis patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Critical care nephrology: opportunities for implementing green practices.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: What's New Regarding Its Diagnostics and Therapeutics?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveAcute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a common and severe complication in patients diagnosed with sepsis. It is associated with higher mortality rates, prolonged hospital stays, increased utilization of medical resources, and financial burden on patients' families. This study aimed to establish and validate predictive models using machine learning algorithms to accurately predict the occurrence of AKI in patients diagnosed with sepsis.
methodsThis retrospective study utilized real observational data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. It included patients aged 18 to 90 years diagnosed with sepsis who were admitted to the ICU for the first time and had hospital stays exceeding 48 hours. Predictive models, employing various machine learning algorithms including Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), EXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression (LR), were developed. The dataset was randomly divided into training and test sets at a ratio of 4:1.
resultsA total of 10,575 sepsis patients were included in the analysis, of whom 8,575 (81.1%) developed AKI during hospitalization. A selection of 47 variables was utilized for model construction. The models derived from LightGBM, XGBoost, RF, DT, ANN, SVM, and LR achieved AUCs of 0.801, 0.773, 0.772, 0.737, 0.720, 0.765, and 0.776, respectively. Among these models, LightGBM demonstrated the most superior predictive performance.
conclusionsThese machine learning models offer valuable predictive capabilities for identifying AKI in patients diagnosed with sepsis. The LightGBM model, with its superior predictive capability, could aid clinicians in early identification of high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.