ArticlePloS one2024
Research on an innovative design and evaluation method of Chinese tea sets based on GT-AHP-FCE.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design of a user-centered intelligent shoe cabinet for smart home hygiene using Kano-AHP-TRIZ.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Art therapy-oriented space design for pediatric dental clinics: a Kano-AHP-FCE framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Design and evaluation of a home based upper limb rehabilitation training device for stroke patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A methodological design and an empirical study for assessing the maturity of an UASR based on the AHP-EWM and the FSEM fusion model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Study on the application and evaluation method of Zen aesthetic style in furniture design under the background of sustainability.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Design of walking aids for the elderly based on the Kano-AHP-FEC method.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Innovative design and evaluation of medical nebulizer for preschool children: A user demand-driven approach.PloS one · 2025Article
- Evaluation method and design of greenhouse pear pollination drones based on grounded theory and integrated theory.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsIn order to explore new consumer demands for Chinese tea set products, propose an innovative tea set product design and evaluation method to improve the user experience and satisfaction of the produced tea sets, thereby promoting the development of the tea set market and the promotion of tea culture.
methodsFirstly, grounded theory (GT) was used to analyze interview data to extract consumer demand indicators and construct a design evaluation hierarchical model. Secondly, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to calculate the weights of the indicators, determine their priority of importance, and obtain several indicators that have a greater impact on the tea set design to guide innovative design practice. Lastly, the tea set design schemes were evaluated using the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to select the optimal design scheme and also to act as a guideline for further design optimization.
conclusionThis study explores the innovative design and evaluation method for tea set products based on GT-AHP-FCE and validates the feasibility of this approach through a practical example of tea set design inspired by "The Classic of Mountains and Seas.". It provides innovative theoretical and practical guidance for designers of subsequent tea set products and also provides a new path for the inheritance and innovation of traditional culture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.