Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38603296›Full record

ArticleResearch methods in medicine & health sciences2023

Can learnings from the COVID-19 pandemic improve trial conduct post-pandemic? A case study of strategies used by the DISC trial.

Catherine Knowlson, Puvan Tharmanathan, Catherine Arundel, Sophie James, Lydia Flett, Samantha Gascoyne, Charlie Welch, David Warwick, Joseph Dias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research methods in medicine & health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Catherine KnowlsonDepartment of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, York, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5783-2690
Puvan TharmanathanDepartment of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, York, UK.
Catherine ArundelDepartment of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, York, UK.
Sophie JamesDepartment of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, York, UK.
Lydia FlettDepartment of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, York, UK.
Samantha GascoyneDepartment of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, York, UK.
Charlie WelchDepartment of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, York, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2421-5538
David WarwickUniversity Hospital Southampton, York, UK.
Joseph DiasUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, York, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: RCTs often face issues such as slow recruitment, poor intervention adherence and high attrition, however the 2020/2021 COVID-19 pandemic intensified these challenges. Strategies employed by the DISC trial to overcome pandemic-related barriers to recruitment, treatment delivery and retention may be useful to help overcome routine problems. Methods: A structured survey and teleconference with sites was undertaken. Key performance indicators in relation to recruitment, treatment delivery and retention were compared descriptively before and after the pandemic started. This was situated also in relation to qualitative opinions of research staff. Results: Prior to the pandemic, retention was 93.6%. Increased support from the central trial management team and remote data collection methods kept retention rates high at 81.2% in the first 6 months of the pandemic, rising to 89.8% in the subsequent 6 months. Advertising the study to patients resulted in 12.8 patients/month enquiring about participation, however only six were referred to recruiting sites. Sites reported increased support from junior doctors resolved research nurse capacity issues. One site avoided long delays by using theatre space in a private hospital. Conclusions: Recruitment post-pandemic could be improved by identification of barriers, increased support from junior doctors through the NIHR associate PI scheme and advertising. Remote back-up options for data collection can keep retention high while reducing patient and site burden. To future proof studies against similar disruptions and provide more flexibility for participants, we recommend that RCTs have a back-up option of remote recruitment, a back-up location for surgeries and flexible approaches to collecting data.

Indexed as

COVID-19dupuytren’sintervention deliverypandemicRandomised controlled trialrecruitmentretentiontrial management

Identifiers

PMID38603296
PMCPMC9500425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.