Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38602670›Full record

GuidelineJAMA oncology2024

American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Unresectable Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

George Rodrigues, Kristin A Higgins, Andreas Rimner, Arya Amini, Joe Y Chang, Stephen G Chun, Jessica Donington, Martin J Edelman, Matthew A Gubens, Puneeth Iyengar and 5 more

Abstract readPractice GuidelineSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Guideline in JAMA oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The staging evolution dilemma: TNM-9 sharpens anatomical precision, but is biology still offstage?Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

George RodriguesSchulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Kristin A HigginsWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Andreas RimnerMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Arya AminiCity of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Joe Y ChangThe University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Stephen G ChunThe University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Jessica DoningtonUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Martin J EdelmanFox Chase Comprehensive Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Matthew A GubensHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco.
Puneeth IyengarThe University of Texas at Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Benjamin MovsasHenry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan.
Matthew S NingThe University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Henry S ParkYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Andrea WolfMount Sinai Health System, New York, New York.
Charles B SimoneNew York Proton Center, New York, New York.

Funding

A radiation oncology clinician scientist devoted to building an inclusive clinical research program in an integrated academic satellite network in service to the National Cancer InstituteR50CA275822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Stephen G Chun · 2023 to 2026
$347k
NCI NIH HHS R50 CA275822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) has been informed by more than 5 decades of clinical trials and other relevant literature. However, controversies remain regarding the application of various radiation and systemic therapies in commonly encountered clinical scenarios. Objective: To develop case-referenced consensus and evidence-based guidelines to inform clinical practice in unresectable LA-NSCLC. Evidence Review: The American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) Thoracic Committee guideline is an evidence-based consensus document assessing various clinical scenarios associated with LA-NSCLC. A systematic review of the literature with evidence ratings was conducted to inform the appropriateness of treatment recommendations by the ARS AUC Thoracic Committee for the management of unresectable LA-NSCLC. Findings: Treatment appropriateness of a variety of LA-NSCLC scenarios was assessed by a consensus-based modified Delphi approach using a range of 3 points to 9 points to denote consensus agreement. Committee recommendations were vetted by the ARS AUC Executive Committee and a 2-week public comment period before official approval and adoption. Standard of care management of good prognosis LA-NSCLC consists of combined concurrent radical (60-70 Gy) platinum-based chemoradiation followed by consolidation durvalumab immunotherapy (for patients without progression). Planning and delivery of locally advanced lung cancer radiotherapy usually should be performed using intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques. A variety of palliative and radical fractionation schedules are available to treat patients with poor performance and/or pulmonary status. The salvage therapy for a local recurrence after successful primary management is complex and likely requires both multidisciplinary input and shared decision-making with the patient. Conclusions and Relevance: Evidence-based guidance on the management of various unresectable LA-NSCLC scenarios is provided by the ARS AUC to optimize multidisciplinary patient care for this challenging patient population.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyConsensusHumansSocieties, MedicalUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38602670
PMCPMC11665040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.