Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38602581›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2024

Management of Oligometastatic and Locally Recurrent Urothelial Carcinoma.

Michael A Liu, Jennifer W Li, Karie Runcie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael A LiuDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Jennifer W LiDepartment of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Karie RuncieDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA. kr2836@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

Molecular Oncology Training ProgramT32CA203703 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Katherine D Crew, DAWN HERSHMAN · 2016 to 2026
$4.1M
Mechanisms of liver metastasis and associated resistance to immunotherapyR37CA258829 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Benjamin Izar · 2021 to 2026
$2.6M
NIH HHS 3R37CA258829-03S1NIH HHS T32 CA 203703-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo summarize and evaluate the literature on treatment approaches for oligometastatic and locally recurrent urothelial cancer. RECENT

findingsThere is no clear definition for oligometastatic urothelial cancers due to limited data. Studies focusing on oligometastatic and locally recurrent urothelial cancer have been primarily retrospective. Treatment options include local therapy with surgery or radiation, and generalized systemic therapy such as chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Oligometastatic and locally recurrent urothelial cancers remain challenging to manage, and treatment requires an interdisciplinary approach. Systemic therapy is nearly always a component of current care in the form of chemotherapy, but the role of immunotherapy has not been explored. Consideration of surgical and radiation options may improve outcomes, and no studies have compared directly between the two localized treatment options. The development of new prognostic and predictive biomarkers may also enhance the treatment landscape in the future.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Transitional CellCombined Modality TherapyHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisUrologic NeoplasmsBladder cancerLocally recurrent diseaseOligometastatic diseaseUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.