Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38602578›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Differences in Lymph Node Metastases Patterns Among Non-pancreatic Periampullary Cancers and Histologic Subtypes: An International Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study and Systematic Review.

Bas A Uijterwijk, Daniël H Lemmers, Giuseppe Kito Fusai, Alessandro Zerbi, Roberto Salvia, Ernesto Sparrelid, Steven White, Bergthor Björnsson, Vasileios K Mavroeidis, Keith J Roberts and 24 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Bas A UijterwijkDepartment of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy. basuijterwijk@live.nl.
Daniël H LemmersDepartment of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Giuseppe Kito FusaiDepartment of Surgery, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Alessandro ZerbiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Italy and Pancreatic Surgery, Humanitas University, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Pieve Emanuele, Rozzano, Italy.
Roberto SalviaDepartment of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Ernesto SparrelidDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Steven WhiteDepartment of Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
Bergthor BjörnssonDepartment of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Vasileios K MavroeidisDepartment of Academic Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Keith J RobertsFaculty of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Michele MazzolaDivision of Oncologic and Mini-Invasive General Surgery, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Santiago Sánchez CabúsDepartment of Surgery, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Zahir SoonawallaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Dimitris KorkolisDepartment of Surgery, Hellenic Anticancer Hospital "Saint Savvas", Athens, Greece.
Mario SerradillaDepartment of Surgery, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
Patrick PessauxHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Nouvel Hôpital Civil (NHC), Strasbourg, France.
Misha LuyerDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Nicholas MowbrayDepartment of Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.
Benedetto IelpoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Alessandro MazzottaDepartment of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
Jorg KleeffDepartment of Surgery, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Ugo BoggiDepartment of Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Miguel Angel Suarez MuñozDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Malaga, Spain.
Brian K P GohDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Duke-National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Elena AndreottiDepartment of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Hanneke WilminkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michele GhidiniOncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Alberto ZaniboniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Caroline VerbekeDepartment of Pathology, University of Oslo, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Volkan AdsayDepartment of Pathology, Koç University Hospital and Koç University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey.
Denise BianchiDepartment of Pathology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Marc G BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mohammed Abu HilalDepartment of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy. abuhilal9@gmail.com.
International Study Group on Non-Pancreatic Periampullary Cancer (ISGACA)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandard lymphadenectomy for pancreatoduodenectomy is defined for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and adopted for patients with non-pancreatic periampullary cancer (NPPC), ampullary adenocarcinoma (AAC), distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA), or duodenal adenocarcinoma (DAC). This study aimed to compare the patterns of lymph node metastases among the different NPPCs in a large series and in a systematic review to guide the discussion on surgical lymphadenectomy and pathology assessment.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for NPPC with at least one lymph node metastasis (2010-2021) from 24 centers in nine countries. The primary outcome was identification of lymph node stations affected in case of a lymph node metastasis per NPPC. A separate systematic review included studies on lymph node metastases patterns of AAC, dCCA, and DAC.

resultsThe study included 2367 patients, of whom 1535 had AAC, 616 had dCCA, and 216 had DAC. More patients with pancreatobiliary type AAC had one or more lymph node metastasis (67.2% vs 44.8%; P < 0.001) compared with intestinal-type, but no differences in metastasis pattern were observed. Stations 13 and 17 were most frequently involved (95%, 94%, and 90%). Whereas dCCA metastasized more frequently to station 12 (13.0% vs 6.4% and 7.0%, P = 0.005), DAC metastasized more frequently to stations 6 (5.0% vs 0% and 2.7%; P < 0.001) and 14 (17.0% vs 8.4% and 11.7%, P = 0.015).

conclusionThis study is the first to comprehensively demonstrate the differences and similarities in lymph node metastases spread among NPPCs, to identify the existing research gaps, and to underscore the importance of standardized lymphadenectomy and pathologic assessment for AAC, dCCA, and DAC.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAmpulla of VaterCommon Bile Duct NeoplasmsDuodenal NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomyAgedBile Duct NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCholangiocarcinomaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymph Nodes

Identifiers

PMID38602578
PMCPMC11164734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.