Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38602432›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2024

Never-Ending Learning for Explainable Brain Computing.

Hongzhi Kuai, Jianhui Chen, Xiaohui Tao, Lingyun Cai, Kazuyuki Imamura, Hiroki Matsumoto, Peipeng Liang, Ning Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Potential of Cognitive-Inspired Neural Network Modeling Framework for Computer Vision.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  4. The analgesic effect and neural mechanism of spicy food intake.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Never-Ending Learning for Explainable Brain Computing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hongzhi KuaiFaculty of Engineering, Maebashi Institute of Technology, Gunma, 371-0816, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2746-648X
Jianhui ChenFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Xiaohui TaoSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Computing, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, 4350, Australia.
Lingyun CaiSchool of Psychology and Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China.
Kazuyuki ImamuraFaculty of Engineering, Maebashi Institute of Technology, Gunma, 371-0816, Japan.
Hiroki MatsumotoFaculty of Engineering, Maebashi Institute of Technology, Gunma, 371-0816, Japan.
Peipeng LiangSchool of Psychology and Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China.
Ning ZhongFaculty of Engineering, Maebashi Institute of Technology, Gunma, 371-0816, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5161-6831

Funding

JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research of Japan 19K12123Key Research Project of Academy for Multidisciplinary Studies of Capital Normal University JCKXYJY2019019National Basic Research Program of China 2014CB744600National Key Research and Development Project of China 2020YFC2007302National Natural Science Foundation of China 61420106005Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality 4222022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exploring the nature of human intelligence and behavior is a longstanding pursuit in cognitive neuroscience, driven by the accumulation of knowledge, information, and data across various studies. However, achieving a unified and transparent interpretation of findings presents formidable challenges. In response, an explainable brain computing framework is proposed that employs the never-ending learning paradigm, integrating evidence combination and fusion computing within a Knowledge-Information-Data (KID) architecture. The framework supports continuous brain cognition investigation, utilizing joint knowledge-driven forward inference and data-driven reverse inference, bolstered by the pre-trained language modeling techniques and the human-in-the-loop mechanisms. In particular, it incorporates internal evidence learning through multi-task functional neuroimaging analyses and external evidence learning via topic modeling of published neuroimaging studies, all of which involve human interactions at different stages. Based on two case studies, the intricate uncertainty surrounding brain localization in human reasoning is revealed. The present study also highlights the potential of systematization to advance explainable brain computing, offering a finer-grained understanding of brain activity patterns related to human intelligence.

Indexed as

BrainCognitionHumansIntelligenceLearningevidence combination and fusion computingexplainable brain computingfunctional neuroimaginghigh‐order brain cognitionhuman‐in‐the‐loopnever‐ending learningthinking and reasoning

Identifiers

PMID38602432
PMCPMC11200082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.