Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38602200›Full record

Trial reportNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2024

Differences in Daily Activity Performance Between Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility and Home Among Stroke Survivors.

Emily Somerville, Gabrielle Blenden, Danielle Kretzer, Brianna Holden, Rebecca M Bollinger, Melissa J Krauss, Meghan Haxton, Noah Martin, Alexandre Carter, Susan L Stark

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emily SomervilleProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Gabrielle BlendenProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Danielle KretzerThe Rehabilitation Institute of St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Brianna HoldenProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Rebecca M BollingerProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Melissa J KraussProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Meghan HaxtonProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Noah MartinProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Alexandre CarterDivision of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Susan L StarkProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2816-7158

Funding

COMPASS: A NOVEL TRANSITION PROGRAM TO REDUCE DISABILITY AFTER STROKER01HD092398 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Susan Lynn Stark · 2017 to 2026
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD092398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke survivors are one of the largest consumer groups of rehabilitation services. Despite improvement in daily activities while in inpatient rehabilitation, many have difficulty performing daily activities at home after discharge. The difference in performance between a standard clinical context and at home is poorly understood.

objectiveTo better understand differences in activity performance during transition from inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) to home, we examined daily activity performance scores from 2 different environments (IRF and home) at the same time point (discharge).

methodsThis was a cross-sectional analysis using baseline data from a randomized controlled trial. Participants were stroke survivors aged ≥50 who planned to discharge home from the IRF. The Functional Independence Measure and Section GG codes (both converted to International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health scores) were conducted per protocol first at home and then in the IRF at discharge (≤3 days apart, order not randomized).

resultsAmong 57 participants, activity scores at home were significantly worse than scores at IRF discharge. Over 40% of participants had discharge scores indicating no-to-mild impairment for shower/tub transfer, walking, and going up/down stairs, while home visit scores indicated moderate-to-complete impairment for those activities. The greatest differences in scores were for shower/tub transfer (median difference 1.5, 95% CI 1.00-2.00) and going up/down stairs (median difference 1.50, 95% CI 1.00-2.00).

conclusionThe environment plays an important role in stroke survivors' functioning at home. Future studies should further examine how the environment impacts activity performance upon returning home following stroke.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingPatient DischargeRehabilitation CentersStroke RehabilitationAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareStrokeSurvivorsfunctional statusinpatientsoccupational therapystroke

Identifiers

PMID38602200
PMCPMC11100317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.