Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38602153›Full record

ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2024

Retrospective Review of Outcomes Related to Early Therapy Intervention Following Application of Cultured Epidermal Autografts in Severely Burned Patients.

Sarah Sabbatini, Sai R Velamuri, David M Hill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah SabbatiniBurn Rehabilitation Department, Regional One Health, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-7836-4927
Sai R VelamuriDepartment of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.
David M HillDepartment of Pharmacy, Regional One Health, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1119-1901

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultured epidermal autografts (CEA) have since become more prevalent in the treatment of burn-injured patients with limited available donor sites for adequate wound closure, resulting in decreased mortality rates and an increased number of these patients requiring burn therapy services to achieve optimal functional outcomes at discharge. However, the use and postoperative management of CEA continue to be controversial due large to the physiological fragility and expense of CEA, leading to variable postoperative treatment practices across burn centers. As such, minimal research is available regarding patient outcomes following CEA application, specifically related to burn therapy intervention. Thus, a retrospective chart review was conducted on a series of 10 patients, 18 years of age or older, admitted to a single, American Burn Association verified burn center, between April 2015 and April 2023, who required CEA and received pre- and postoperative treatment by burn therapists in accordance with center-specific burn rehabilitation guidelines. The resulting patient outcomes, in response to early implementation of therapy interventions post-CEA surgery, demonstrated optimal functional status for patients upon discharge and positive long-term implications.

Indexed as

BurnsSkin TransplantationAdultAutograftsBurn UnitsEpidermisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, AutologousTreatment OutcomeWound Healingaftercareburnscultured epidermal autograftsearly ambulationrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID38602153
PMCPMC11303124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.