Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38602074›Full record

SynthesisHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2024

A systematic review on malaria and dengue vaccines for the effective management of these mosquito borne diseases: Improving public health.

Hind M Al-Osaimi, Mohammed Kanan, Lujain Marghlani, Badria Al-Rowaili, Reem Albalawi, Abrar Saad, Saba Alasmari, Khaled Althobaiti, Zainab Alhulaili, Abeer Alanzi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Hind M Al-OsaimiDepartment of Pharmacy Services Administration, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh Second Health Cluster, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed KananDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Lujain MarghlaniDepartment of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0003-2114-8784
Badria Al-RowailiPharmaceutical Services Department, Northern Area Armed Forces Hospital, King Khalid Military, Hafr Al Batin, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Reem AlbalawiDepartment of Medicine, Tabuk University, Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0007-4987-7638
Abrar SaadPharmacy Department, Royal Commission Hospital, Yanbu, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0009-3502-3118
Saba AlasmariDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Khaled AlthobaitiDepartment of Medicine, Taif University, Ta'if, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0000-2171-1985
Zainab AlhulailiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Dammam Medical Complex, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abeer AlanziDepartment of Medicine, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Makkah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0005-1234-5641
Rawan AlqarniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Razan AlsofiyaniDepartment of Medicine, Taif University, Ta'if, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Reem ShrwaniDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
King Fahd Medical City · SAKing Khalid University · SATaif University · SADammam Central Hospital · SAJazan University · SAKing Abdulaziz Hospital · SAKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SANorthern Area Armed Forces Hospital · SARoyal Commission Medical Center · SAUniversity of Tabuk · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect vector-borne diseases (VBDs) pose significant global health challenges, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. The WHO has launched the "Global Vector Control Response (GVCR) 2017-2030" to address these diseases, emphasizing a comprehensive approach to vector control. This systematic review investigates the potential of malaria and dengue vaccines in controlling mosquito-borne VBDs, aiming to alleviate disease burdens and enhance public health. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, the review incorporated 39 new studies out of 934 identified records. It encompasses various studies assessing malaria and dengue vaccines, emphasizing the significance of vaccination as a preventive measure. The findings indicate variations in vaccine efficacy, duration of protection, and safety considerations for each disease, influencing public health strategies. The review underscores the urgent need for vaccines to combat the increasing burden of VBDs like malaria and dengue, advocating for ongoing research and investment in vaccine development.

Indexed as

DengueDengue VaccinesMalariaMosquito-Borne DiseasesAnimalsHumansPublic HealthDengue Vaccineseffective managementimproving public healthinsect vector-borne diseasesSystematic reviewvaccines

Identifiers

PMID38602074
PMCPMC11017952
OpenAlexW4394720095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.