Observational studyEuropean journal of ophthalmology2025
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT-angiography in syndromic versus non-syndromic
Observational study in European journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genotype-phenotype correlations in retinitis pigmentosa: structural and vascular insights using OCT and OCTA.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Article
- Bromelain and Curcumin Oral Supplementation for Refractory Inherited Retinal Dystrophy-Related Macular Oedema: Changes in Macular Thickness and Visual Acuity over 12 Months.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the retinal and choroidal microvasculature in retinitis pigmentosa using OCT-angiography: a meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare non-syndromic and syndromic forms of
methodsObservational, cross-sectional, multicenter study. All patients underwent best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, OCT (Spectralis HRA + OCT, Heidelberg Engineering) and OCTA (OCT DRI Topcon Triton, Topcon Corporation). We compared subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT), choroidal vascularity index (CVI), presence of cystroid macular edema (CME), macular vessel density (VD) at the superficial and deep capillary plexa, as well as VD of the radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) network, between syndromic and non-syndromic patients with
resultsThirty-four eyes from 18 patients (7 females) were included. Thirteen patients (72.2%) were affected by Usher syndrome type 2, whereas the remaining 5 subjects (27.8%) had non-syndromic retinitis pigmentosa (nsRP). Syndromic patients were younger than nsRP (
conclusionsDespite their younger age, patients with Usher syndrome type 2 displayed similar choroidal and microvascular changes compared to those with nsRP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.