Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38601970›Full record

ArticleFood technology and biotechnology2024

Fruit Quality Assessment of Novel Hybrid Pummelo × Sweet Orange and Its Molecular Characterization Using Acidity Specific Markers.

Raushan Kumar, Nimisha Sharma, Anil Kumar Dubey, Radha Mohan Sharma, Shruti Sethi, Gyan Prakash Mishra, Sandeep Mathur, Hatkari Vittal, Mukesh Shivran, Neha Sharma

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food technology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raushan KumarDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, 110012 New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2862-0256
Nimisha SharmaDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, 110012 New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7814-8601
Anil Kumar DubeyDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, 110012 New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8874-7448
Radha Mohan SharmaDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, 110012 New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4171-2963
Shruti SethiDivision of Food Science and Postharvest Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute Pusa Campus,110012 New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2091-3048
Gyan Prakash MishraDivision of Seed Science and Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, 110012 New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7023-2638
Sandeep MathurDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, 110012 New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9231-0909
Hatkari VittalDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, 110012 New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8331-5897
Mukesh ShivranDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, 110012 New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1555-8248
Neha SharmaICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, Pusa Campus, 110012 New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0675-0860
Indian Agricultural Research Institute · INNational Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research background: There is considerable diversity in newly developed pummelo × sweet orange citrus hybrids. Most hybrids showed lower peel thickness and high juice yield but there is a lack of information on fruit quality parameters and molecular characterization. Therefore, the aim of the current study is to determine the content of antioxidants and properties of the fresh juice of 24 new pummelo × sweet orange citrus hybrids ( Experimental approach: The correlation and estimate of inheritance of the fruit juice properties: ascorbic acid, total phenol, total flavonoid, total antioxidant, total soluble solid and sugar contents, pH, titratable acidity, along with sensory evaluation was performed. Molecular characterization of these hybrids was carried out using Results and conclusions: The main constituents of the fruit juice of pummelo × sweet orange hybrids were observed in the range of Novelty and scientific contribution: These newly developed pummelo × sweet orange citrus hybrids are a valuable source of high-quality antioxidants for a healthy diet. The identification of trait markers that enable selection at the seedling stage is of great benefit to citrus breeders, as the characteristic features of a mature tree are not yet visible at the juvenile stage.

Indexed as

acidity specific markersantioxidantsascorbic acidhybridsnutritional qualitypummelosweet orange

Identifiers

PMID38601970
PMCPMC11002445
OpenAlexW4390740018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.