Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38601958›Full record

ArticleFood technology and biotechnology2024

Causal Artificial Intelligence Models of Food Quality Data.

Želimir Kurtanjek

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food technology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Želimir KurtanjekUniversity of Zagreb Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, Pierotijeva 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5453-6255
University of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research background: The aim of this study is to emphasize the importance of artificial intelligence (AI) and causality modelling of food quality and analysis with 'big data'. AI with structural causal modelling (SCM), based on Bayesian networks and deep learning, enables the integration of theoretical field knowledge in food technology with process production, physicochemical analytics and consumer organoleptic assessments. Food products have complex nature and data are highly dimensional, with intricate interrelations (correlations) that are difficult to relate to consumer sensory perception of food quality. Standard regression modelling techniques such as multiple ordinary least squares (OLS) and partial least squares (PLS) are effectively applied for the prediction by linear interpolations of observed data under cross-sectional stationary conditions. Upgrading linear regression models by machine learning (ML) accounts for nonlinear relations and reveals functional patterns, but is prone to confounding and failed predictions under unobserved nonstationary conditions. Confounding of data variables is the main obstacle to applications of the regression models in food innovations under previously untrained conditions. Hence, this manuscript focuses on applying causal graphical models with Bayesian networks to infer causal relationships and intervention effects between process variables and consumer sensory assessment of food quality. Experimental approach: This study is based on the data available in the literature on the process of wheat bread baking quality, consumer sensory quality assessments of fermented milk products, and professional wine tasting data. The data for wheat baking quality were regularized by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO elastic net). Bayesian statistics was applied for the evaluation of the model joint probability function for inferring the network structure and parameters. The obtained SCMs are presented as directed acyclic graphs (DAG). D-separation criteria were applied to block confounding effects in estimating direct and total causal effects of process variables and consumer perception on food quality. Probability distributions of causal effects of the intervention of individual process variables on quality are presented as partial dependency plots determined by Bayesian neural networks. In the case of wine quality causality, the total causal effects determined by SCMs are positively validated by the double machine learning (DML) algorithm. Results and conclusions: The data set of 45 continuous variables corresponding to different chemical, physical and biochemical variables of wheat properties from seven Croatian cultivars during two years of controlled cultivation were analysed. LASSO regularization of the data set yielded the ten key predictors, accounting for 98 % variance of the baking quality data. Based on the key variables, the quality predictive random forest model with 75 % cross-validation accuracy was derived. Causal analysis between the quality and key predictors was based on the Bayesian model shown as a DAG graph. Protein content shows the most important direct causal effect with the corresponding path coefficient of 0.71, and THMM (total high-molecular-mass glutenin subunits) content was an indirect cause with a path coefficient of 0.42, and protein total average causal effect (ACE) was 0.65. The large data set of the quality of fermented milk products included binary consumer sensory data (taste, odour, turbidity), continuous physical variables (temperature, fat, pH, colour) and three grade classes of products by consumer quality assessment. A random forest model was derived for the prediction of the quality classification with an out-of-bag (OOB) error of 0.28 %. The Bayesian network model predicts that the direct causes of the taste classification are temperature, colour and fat content, while the direct causes of the quality classification are temperature, turbidity, odour and fat content. The key quality grade ACE of temperature -0.04 grade/°C and 0.3 quality grade/fat content were estimated. The temperature ACE dependency shows a nonlinear type as negative saturation with the 'breaking' point at 60 °C, while for fat ACE had a positive linear trend. Causal quality analysis of red and white wine was based on the large data set of eleven continuous variables of physical and chemical properties and quality assessments classified in ten classes, from 1 to 10. Each classification was obtained in triplicate by a panel of professional wine tasters. A non-structural double machine learning (DML) algorithm was applied for total ACE quality assessment. The alcohol content of red and white wine had the key positive ACE relative factor of 0.35 quality/alcohol, while volatile acidity had the key negative ACE of -0.2 quality/acidity. The obtained ACE predictions by the unstructured DML algorithm are in close agreement with the ACE obtained by the structural SCM. Novelty and scientific contribution: Novel methodologies and results for the application of causal artificial intelligence models in the analysis of consumer assessment of the quality of food products are presented. The application of Bayesian network structural causal models (SCM) enables the d-separation of pronounced effects of confounding between parameters in noncausal regression models. Based on the SCM, inference of ACE provides substantiated and validated research hypotheses for new products and support for decisions of potential interventions for improvement in product design, new process introduction, process control, management and marketing.

Indexed as

ACEAI causalityBayesian networkfood qualityintervention effects

Identifiers

PMID38601958
PMCPMC11002446
OpenAlexW4390651534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.