Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38601762›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic on neoadjuvant chemotherapy use in patients diagnosed with epithelial type ovarian cancer.

Amrita Mukherjee, Natalie Shammas, Lanfang Xu, Kimberly L Cannavale, Alec D Gilfillan, Elizabeth A Szamreta, Matthew Monberg, Melissa Hodeib, Chun R Chao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Amrita MukherjeeDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Natalie ShammasObstetrics and Gynecology, Adventist Health White Memorial Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Lanfang XuData Reporting and Analytics, MedHealth Statistical Consulting Inc., Solon, OH, United States.
Kimberly L CannavaleDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Alec D GilfillanDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Elizabeth A SzamretaCenter for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Matthew MonbergCenter for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Melissa HodeibGynecology Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Riverside, CA, United States.
Chun R ChaoDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Kaiser Permanente · USMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USKaiser Permanente Riverside Medical Center · USStatistical Research (United States) · USWhite Memorial Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed critical challenges in providing care to ovarian cancer (OC) patients, including delays in OC diagnosis and treatment initiation. To accommodate for delays in OC surgery, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) recommended preferential use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the pandemic. The purpose of this study was to assess the association of the COVID-19 pandemic with neoadjuvant chemotherapy use in patients diagnosed with OC. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with stage II-IV ovarian cancer of epithelial subtype between 01/01/2017-06/30/2021 at Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC), a large integrated healthcare system in the United States. Ovarian cancer patients diagnosed between 2017-2020 were identified from KPSC's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-affiliated cancer registry. Patients diagnosed in 2021 were identified from the electronic medical records (EMR) using ICD-10 diagnosis codes, followed by medical chart review to validate diagnosis and extract information on histology and stage at diagnosis. March 4, 2020 was used as the cut-off to define pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between OC diagnosis and treatment completion were excluded. Data on neoadjuvant chemotherapy use were extracted from the cancer registry and EMR, supplemented by chart review. Modified Poisson regression was used to evaluate the association of the pandemic with neoadjuvant chemotherapy use. Results: Of 566 OC patients, 160 (28.3%) were diagnosed in the pandemic period. Patients diagnosed in the pandemic period were slightly younger (mean age 62.7 Discussions: Ovarian cancer patients diagnosed in the COVID-19 pandemic were more likely to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy than patients diagnosed before the pandemic. Future research on patient outcomes and trends in the post-pandemic period are warranted.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicneoadjuvant chemotherapyovarian cancerrace/ethnicitysurgery

Identifiers

PMID38601762
PMCPMC11005450
OpenAlexW4393224188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.